The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13R Pro and Samsung Galaxy A55 represent compelling options. The Redmi Note 13R Pro aims to deliver strong performance at an aggressive price point, while the Galaxy A55 focuses on a refined experience with Samsung’s software and a brighter display. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right phone.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing battery life and a vibrant display, the Samsung Galaxy A55 is the better choice. Its Exynos 1480 chipset, coupled with excellent software optimization, delivers a smoother experience and significantly longer runtime. However, the Redmi Note 13R Pro offers a compelling value proposition for budget-conscious users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, November 20 | 2024, March 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, November 20 | Available. Released 2024, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.1 x 75 x 7.7 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.30 in) | 161.1 x 77.4 x 8.2 mm (6.34 x 3.05 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1000 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6080 (6 nm) | Exynos 1480 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Xclipse 530 |
| OS | Android 13, MIUI 14 | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 108 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Gold | Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon |
| Models | 2311FRAFDC | SM-A556V, SM-A556B, SM-A556B/DS, SM-A556E, SM-A556E/DS, SM-A5560 |
| Price | About 260 EUR | $ 324.99 / £ 251.50 / € 319.99 / ₹ 23,998 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.68 W/kg (head) 1.04 W/kg (body) |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13R Pro
- Potentially lower price point
- Capable Dimensity 6080 processor for everyday tasks
- 33W fast charging
- Less efficient 6nm chipset
- Likely lower display brightness and color accuracy
- Potentially shorter battery life
Samsung Galaxy A55
- Brighter and more vibrant display (1010 nits)
- More efficient Exynos 1480 (4nm) chipset
- Longer battery life (13:27h active use)
- Slower 25W charging
- Higher price point
- Samsung’s One UI can be resource intensive
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A55 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1010 nits, compared to an unstated brightness for the Redmi Note 13R Pro. This translates to superior visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While the Redmi Note 13R Pro’s panel technology isn’t specified, Samsung’s Super AMOLED panels are known for their vibrant colors and deep blacks. The A55’s brightness advantage is particularly beneficial for media consumption and gaming. We expect the Redmi Note 13R Pro to have a standard LCD or AMOLED panel, lacking the peak brightness and color accuracy of the A55.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Redmi Note 13R Pro, a direct comparison is limited. However, Samsung typically prioritizes image processing and software optimization. The Galaxy A55 likely benefits from Samsung’s advanced algorithms for noise reduction and dynamic range. While both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup, the A55’s image processing will likely result in more consistent and pleasing results, especially in challenging lighting conditions. We can assume the Redmi Note 13R Pro will focus on providing a versatile camera experience at a lower price point, potentially sacrificing some image quality.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A55’s Exynos 1480 (4nm) chipset offers a clear architectural advantage over the Redmi Note 13R Pro’s MediaTek Dimensity 6080 (6nm). The Exynos 1480 utilizes newer Cortex-A78 cores (2.75 GHz) compared to the A76 cores (2.4 GHz) in the Dimensity 6080. This translates to better single-core performance and improved responsiveness in demanding applications. The 4nm process node of the Exynos 1480 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions. While both phones feature 8GB of RAM (assumed based on market segment), the Exynos 1480’s superior architecture will likely provide a smoother multitasking experience.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A55 demonstrates a clear advantage in battery life, achieving 13 hours and 27 minutes of active use. While the Redmi Note 13R Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, its 33W wired charging is slower than the A55’s 25W. The Exynos 1480’s 4nm process contributes to improved power efficiency, allowing the A55 to extract more runtime from its battery. The slower charging speed on the Redmi Note 13R Pro means longer downtime between charges, despite potentially having a larger battery capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13R Pro if you need a phone primarily for casual gaming and everyday tasks, and prioritize maximizing value for your money. You’ll benefit from a capable processor and a decent feature set without breaking the bank. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A55 if you prefer a more polished user experience, a brighter and more color-accurate display, and longer battery life, even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 1480 in the Galaxy A55 tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Exynos 1480’s 4nm process node and Samsung’s thermal management solutions generally prevent significant overheating during gaming. While some warmth is expected, it shouldn’t lead to substantial performance throttling, offering a more consistent gaming experience compared to less efficient chipsets.
❓ Is the 33W charging on the Redmi Note 13R Pro fast enough for daily use, or is the 25W on the A55 a significant drawback?
While 33W is faster than 25W, the Galaxy A55’s superior battery life mitigates the slower charging speed. The A55’s longer runtime means you’ll need to charge less frequently, reducing the impact of the slower charging. However, if you frequently need to top up your phone quickly, the Redmi Note 13R Pro’s 33W charging will be more convenient.
❓ How does the performance of the Dimensity 6080 compare to the Exynos 1480 in real-world app loading and multitasking?
The Exynos 1480’s newer Cortex-A78 cores and 4nm process provide a noticeable advantage in app loading times and multitasking smoothness. You’ll likely experience faster app launches and more responsive switching between applications on the Galaxy A55 compared to the Redmi Note 13R Pro.
