Poco X6 Pro vs Redmi Note 13: Which Xiaomi Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and faster charging, the Poco X6 Pro is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset delivers significantly more processing power. However, if battery life is paramount and you’re willing to trade some speed, the Redmi Note 13 offers exceptional endurance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 | Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, January 04 | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, January 10 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 161.1 x 75 x 7.6 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.30 in) | 160.5 x 74.3 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 174.5 g (6.14 oz) | 186 g or 190 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors*, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, 1000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6080 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, HyperOS | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 67W wired, QC2.0, PD3.0, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Graphite black (Stealth Black), Arctic White, Ocean Teal, Prism Gold | Black, Yellow, Gray |
| Models | 2312DRAABG, 2312DRAABI | 2311DRK48G, 2311DRK48I |
| Price | $ 118.38 / £ 206.65 / € 150.99 / ₹ 15,950 | € 195.30 / $ 209.79 / £ 274.99 / ₹ 21,999 |
| SAR | 1.07 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.94 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13
- Exceptional battery life (9:49h active use)
- More affordable price point (likely)
- Sufficient performance for everyday tasks
- Slower processor compared to the X6 Pro
- Slower 33W charging
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
- Powerful Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset
- Faster 67W charging with QC2.0/PD3.0
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Slightly shorter battery life (11:46h active use)
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
The Poco X6 Pro boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 1148 nits, compared to the Redmi Note 13’s 991 nits. This translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels (not specified in the data), the higher brightness of the X6 Pro provides a more vibrant and engaging viewing experience. The lack of refresh rate data prevents a full assessment, but the brightness difference is a key differentiator.
Camera Comparison
The provided data only indicates that the Poco X6 Pro has a 'Photo / Video' camera, lacking specifics. Given the X6 Pro’s positioning, it’s reasonable to expect a more advanced camera system with a larger sensor and potentially optical image stabilization (OIS). The Redmi Note 13’s camera specs are entirely absent, making a direct comparison impossible. However, in this price bracket, sensor size and image processing algorithms are critical, and the X6 Pro is likely to offer superior image quality.
Performance
The performance gap between these two phones is substantial. The Poco X6 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra, built on a 4nm process, is a significant upgrade over the Redmi Note 13’s Dimensity 6080 (6nm). The X6 Pro’s CPU configuration – a 1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715, 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715, and 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510 – offers a more robust architecture than the Note 13’s 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a superior gaming experience. The 4nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads.
Battery Life
Despite the Redmi Note 13 having a smaller battery (implied, not stated), it achieves an impressive 9:49h of active use. The Poco X6 Pro extends this to 11:46h, demonstrating the efficiency gains from its 4nm chipset. However, the X6 Pro also features 67W wired charging with support for QC2.0 and PD3.0, allowing a full charge in just 45 minutes, a significant advantage over the Note 13’s slower 33W charging. This faster charging mitigates the impact of potentially needing to charge more frequently.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 if you need a phone that reliably lasts a full day and beyond on a single charge, and you primarily use your phone for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light gaming. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro if you prefer a phone capable of handling demanding games, video editing, and multitasking without slowdown, and you value faster charging speeds.