Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 vs. Samsung Galaxy A55: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Champions
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and a consistently smooth experience, the Samsung Galaxy A55 emerges as the stronger contender. Its Exynos 1480 chipset and superior battery optimization deliver a significant advantage in endurance, despite the Redmi Note 13’s competitive price.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 | Samsung Galaxy A55 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, January 04 | 2024, March 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, January 10 | Available. Released 2024, March 15 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.1 x 75 x 7.6 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.30 in) | 161.1 x 77.4 x 8.2 mm (6.34 x 3.05 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 174.5 g (6.14 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors*, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, 1000 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6080 (6 nm) | Exynos 1480 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Xclipse 530 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, HyperOS | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Graphite black (Stealth Black), Arctic White, Ocean Teal, Prism Gold | Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon |
| Models | 2312DRAABG, 2312DRAABI | SM-A556V, SM-A556B, SM-A556B/DS, SM-A556E, SM-A556E/DS, SM-A5560 |
| Price | $ 118.38 / £ 206.65 / € 150.99 / ₹ 15,950 | $ 324.99 / £ 251.50 / € 319.99 / ₹ 23,998 |
| SAR | 1.07 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.94 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) | 0.68 W/kg (head) 1.04 W/kg (body) |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13
- More affordable price point
- Faster wired charging (33W)
- Bright display with 991 nits peak brightness
- Significantly shorter battery life
- Less powerful processor for demanding tasks
- Potentially less refined camera image processing
Samsung Galaxy A55
- Superior battery life (13:27h active use)
- More efficient Exynos 1480 chipset
- Likely better camera image quality and OIS
- Samsung’s software ecosystem and update promise
- Slower wired charging (25W)
- Higher price tag
- May lack expandable storage (typical for Samsung)
Display Comparison
Both the Redmi Note 13 and Galaxy A55 boast vibrant displays, with the A55 edging out the Note 13 in peak brightness at 1010 nits versus 991 nits. While the difference isn't massive, it translates to slightly better visibility under direct sunlight. Both likely utilize AMOLED panels, though the A55’s panel is expected to have better color accuracy and viewing angles, typical of Samsung’s display technology. The absence of LTPO technology on either device suggests a standard 60/120Hz refresh rate, impacting power consumption during dynamic content.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is limited. However, Samsung generally excels in image processing, and the A55 is likely to deliver more consistent and refined photos, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The Redmi Note 13 may rely more heavily on software enhancements, which can sometimes result in over-sharpened or artificial-looking images. The presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the A55 (likely) would be a significant advantage for video recording and low-light photography, reducing blur and improving stability.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Redmi Note 13 utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 6080 (6nm), while the Galaxy A55 features the Samsung Exynos 1480 (4nm). The 4nm process node of the Exynos 1480 provides a significant advantage in power efficiency, contributing to the A55’s superior battery life. The A55’s CPU configuration – 4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – also represents a step up in performance compared to the Note 13’s 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. This translates to faster app loading times and smoother multitasking on the A55.
Battery Life
The Galaxy A55’s active use score of 13:27h significantly surpasses the Redmi Note 13’s 9:49h. This difference is attributable to the more efficient Exynos 1480 chipset and Samsung’s software optimizations. While the Redmi Note 13 supports faster 33W wired charging compared to the A55’s 25W, the A55’s larger battery capacity and lower power draw mean it still offers a more practical and reliable all-day battery experience. The slower charging speed on the A55 is a trade-off for the extended runtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 if you need a highly affordable device with a bright display and don't mind slightly less refined performance. It's ideal for casual users and those on a strict budget. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A55 if you prioritize long-lasting battery life, a more powerful processor for demanding tasks, and Samsung’s established software ecosystem. It’s the better choice for power users and those who value longevity.