Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro vs. Samsung Galaxy A55: A Deep Dive Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity, the Samsung Galaxy A55 emerges as the winner. Its significantly longer 13:27h active use battery life outweighs the Redmi Note 13 Pro’s brighter display and slightly faster charging. However, gamers and power users may find the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 in the Redmi Note 13 Pro more appealing.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A55 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, September 21 | 2024, March 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, September 21 | Available. Released 2024, March 15 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.2 x 74.2 x 8 mm (6.35 x 2.92 x 0.31 in) | 161.1 x 77.4 x 8.2 mm (6.34 x 3.05 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 187 g (6.60 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Resolution | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) | Exynos 1480 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Xclipse 530 |
| OS | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 17 min, 100% in 44 min | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5100 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight Black, Aurora Purple (Coral Purple), Ocean Teal, Arctic White, Olive Green, Scarlet Red | Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon |
| Models | 2312DRA50C, 2312CRAD3C, 2312DRA50G, 2312DRA50I | SM-A556V, SM-A556B, SM-A556B/DS, SM-A556E, SM-A556E/DS, SM-A5560 |
| Price | € 220.35 / $ 269.99 / £ 229.00 / ₹ 23,499 | $ 324.99 / £ 251.50 / € 319.99 / ₹ 23,998 |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.03 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) | 0.68 W/kg (head) 1.04 W/kg (body) |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro
- Brighter display for outdoor use
- Faster 67W wired charging
- Potentially better sustained gaming performance
- Shorter battery life
- Less refined software experience (typically)
Samsung Galaxy A55
- Significantly longer battery life
- Refined Samsung One UI software
- Guaranteed software updates
- Slower 25W wired charging
- Lower peak display brightness
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 13 Pro boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 1331 nits, compared to the Galaxy A55’s 1010 nits. This translates to superior visibility under direct sunlight. While both utilize 4nm chipsets, the display power draw impacts battery life. The A55’s lower peak brightness contributes to its longer runtime. Both devices likely employ AMOLED panels, but the Redmi Note 13 Pro’s higher brightness may come at the cost of slightly reduced color accuracy in certain scenarios. We'd need display calibration data to confirm this.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond 'Photo/Video', a direct comparison is limited. However, the Redmi Note 13 Pro’s market positioning suggests a higher megapixel count main sensor, potentially offering more detail in well-lit conditions. The Galaxy A55 likely prioritizes Samsung’s image processing algorithms for consistent, pleasing results. The presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on either device would be a significant advantage for video recording and low-light photography. The 2MP macro cameras found on many phones in this segment are generally of limited utility.
Performance
Both phones utilize 4nm chipsets, but the architectures differ. The Galaxy A55’s Exynos 1480 features a slightly higher peak CPU clock speed (2.75 GHz vs 2.40 GHz on the Redmi Note 13 Pro’s Snapdragon 7s Gen 2). However, the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 utilizes Cortex-A78 cores, known for their efficiency, and may offer a more consistent experience under sustained load. The A55’s CPU advantage is likely more noticeable in single-core tasks, while the Redmi Note 13 Pro may excel in multi-threaded applications. The impact of RAM speed (likely LPDDR5X on both) is minimal in everyday use, but could benefit demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Galaxy A55’s 13:27h active use score is a clear advantage over the Redmi Note 13 Pro’s 10:16h. This difference is likely due to a combination of factors, including the lower peak brightness of the A55’s display and the more efficient Exynos 1480 chipset. While the Redmi Note 13 Pro offers significantly faster 67W wired charging (50% in 17 minutes, 100% in 44 minutes) compared to the A55’s 25W, the A55’s longer battery life reduces the need for frequent top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro if you need a brighter display for outdoor visibility and prioritize faster charging speeds, and enjoy a more raw Android experience. You'll also benefit from the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2's potential for slightly better sustained gaming performance. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A55 if you prefer a longer-lasting battery, a refined software experience with guaranteed updates, and a more balanced overall package with a focus on everyday usability.