Xiaomi continues to dominate the mid-range smartphone market with compelling options like the Redmi Note 12 Turbo and the Poco F5 Pro. Both offer impressive features at competitive prices, but cater to slightly different needs. This comprehensive comparison will break down their strengths and weaknesses to help you make the right choice.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F5 Pro edges out the Redmi Note 12 Turbo thanks to its superior Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset and wireless charging. However, the Redmi Note 12 Turbo offers excellent value with its Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 and potentially better thermal management. It's a close call, depending on your priorities.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, March 28 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, March 28 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 161.1 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 725 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, MIUI 14 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4 | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 15 min
30W wireless, 50% in 32 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, White, Harry Potter Edition | Black, White |
| Models | 23049RAD8C | 23013PC75G |
| Price | About 270 EUR | $ 449.99 / € 241.85 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 1057977 (v9)
GeekBench: 4001 (v5.1), 4009 (v6)
GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Turbo
- Excellent Value
- Smooth Everyday Performance
- Potentially Better Gaming Thermals
- Fast 67W Wired Charging
- Less Powerful Chipset than Poco F5 Pro
- Lower Display Brightness
- No Wireless Charging
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
- Flagship-Level Performance (Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1)
- Brighter Display
- Wireless Charging
- Excellent Battery Life
- Potentially Higher Temperatures under Load
- Slightly Higher Price
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching 1059 nits peak brightness, making it easier to view in direct sunlight. While the Redmi Note 12 Turbo's display is still good, it lacks the same level of outdoor visibility. Both offer excellent contrast ratios and vibrant colors, but the Poco F5 Pro's brightness gives it a clear advantage.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but the Poco F5 Pro likely has a slight edge in image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions, thanks to its more powerful processor and potentially better image processing algorithms. Detailed camera specs are missing, but the 8+ Gen 1 generally allows for more advanced features and better low-light performance. Both should offer good video recording capabilities.
Performance
The Poco F5 Pro's Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is undeniably more powerful than the Redmi Note 12 Turbo's Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2. Expect faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better performance in demanding games. However, the Redmi Note 12 Turbo's chipset is still very capable and may offer better sustained performance due to potentially improved thermal management.
Battery Life
Both phones boast an impressive endurance rating of 99 hours, suggesting excellent battery life. The Redmi Note 12 Turbo's 67W wired charging is comparable to the Poco F5 Pro's, but the Poco F5 Pro adds the convenience of 30W wireless charging, allowing for cable-free top-ups.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Turbo is ideal for users prioritizing value, smooth everyday performance, and potentially better gaming thermals. The Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro is the better choice for those seeking flagship-level performance, a brighter display, and the convenience of wireless charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Poco F5 Pro worth the extra money?
If you prioritize top-tier performance and wireless charging, the Poco F5 Pro is worth the investment. However, if you're on a tighter budget and value excellent value, the Redmi Note 12 Turbo is a compelling alternative.
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Poco F5 Pro generally offers better gaming performance due to its more powerful chipset. However, the Redmi Note 12 Turbo might offer more consistent performance over extended gaming sessions due to potentially better thermal management.
