Xiaomi continues to dominate the mid-range smartphone market with compelling options like the Redmi Note 12 Turbo and the Poco F5. Both offer impressive specs at competitive prices, but cater to slightly different user needs. This comprehensive comparison will break down their strengths and weaknesses to help you make the right choice.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F5 edges out the Redmi Note 12 Turbo thanks to its slightly brighter display, faster charging, and exceptional battery life. While both share the same powerful Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset, the Poco F5’s overall package provides a more polished and feature-rich experience for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, March 28 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, March 28 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 161.1 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 161.1 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 68B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 725 | Adreno 725 |
| OS | Android 13, MIUI 14 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4 | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, White, Harry Potter Edition | Black, Blue, White |
| Models | 23049RAD8C | 23049PCD8G, 23049PCD8I |
| Price | About 270 EUR | € 202.76 / $ 289.99 / ₹ 23,790 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 118h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.3 LUFS (Very good)
|
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Turbo
- Excellent performance thanks to Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
- Compact design compared to the Poco F5
- Fast 67W charging
- Lower peak brightness display
- Potentially less versatile camera system
- Shorter battery life compared to the Poco F5
Xiaomi Poco F5
- Brighter and more vibrant AMOLED display
- Exceptional battery life and endurance
- Fast 67W charging (46 min full charge)
- Potentially better camera system
- Larger size may not suit everyone
- Design might be considered less premium
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.67-inch AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, offering smooth visuals. However, the Poco F5 boasts a significantly higher peak brightness of 963 nits (measured) compared to the Redmi Note 12 Turbo, making it easier to view outdoors. The Poco F5 also has a theoretically infinite contrast ratio, contributing to richer blacks and more vibrant colors. While both offer excellent viewing experiences, the Poco F5 takes a slight lead.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited in the provided specs. However, based on general knowledge, the Poco F5 is expected to have a slightly more versatile camera system, potentially including a higher resolution main sensor and improved image processing algorithms. Both phones likely offer decent photo and video capabilities for their price range, but the Poco F5 is anticipated to deliver slightly better results, especially in challenging lighting conditions.
Performance
Under the hood, both devices are powered by the same Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset and Octa-core CPU. This means you can expect similar performance in everyday tasks, gaming, and multitasking. Both phones handle demanding games with ease. There's little to differentiate them in terms of raw processing power.
Battery Life
The Poco F5 shines in the battery department. It boasts an impressive endurance rating of 118 hours and can be fully charged in just 46 minutes with its 67W charging. The Redmi Note 12 Turbo, while offering 67W charging, doesn't have the same level of battery endurance reported. This makes the Poco F5 a clear winner for users who prioritize all-day battery life.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Turbo is ideal for users prioritizing raw performance and a slightly more compact design. The Poco F5 is the better choice for those who value a vibrant display, long battery life, and faster charging speeds, making it a great all-rounder.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset enough for gaming?
Yes, the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 is a powerful chipset capable of handling most mobile games at high settings. Both phones should provide a smooth gaming experience.
❓ Which phone has better software support?
Xiaomi typically provides consistent software updates for both Redmi and Poco devices. However, Poco sometimes has slightly faster updates due to its more streamlined software approach.
