Redmi Note 12 Pro+ vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ emerges as the stronger choice. Its significantly faster 120W charging and slightly longer battery life, coupled with a comparable active use score of 10:38h, outweigh the Edge 40 Neo’s marginally brighter display. The performance difference is minimal for everyday tasks.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International, China | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, October 27 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, November 01 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162.9 x 76 x 8.9 mm (6.41 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 208.4 g (7.34 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 200 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 19 min | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Arctic White, Iceberg Blue, Obsidian Black, Trend edition | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | 22101316UCP, 22101316UG | XT2307-1 |
| Price | € 349.99 / ₹ 23,899 | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) | - |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+
- Significantly faster 120W charging
- Slightly longer battery life (Endurance Rating)
- Potentially superior camera detail (200MP sensor - not in data, but known)
- Lower peak display brightness
- Potentially more thermal throttling under heavy load
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Higher peak display brightness for better outdoor visibility
- Sleek and refined design
- Cleaner software experience (typical of Motorola)
- Slower 68W charging
- Slightly lower battery endurance
Display Comparison
Both devices feature 6.67-inch displays built on similar technology, but the Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a measured peak brightness of 1073 nits, exceeding the Redmi Note 12 Pro+'s 990 nits. While the difference isn't massive, the Edge 40 Neo will offer better visibility in direct sunlight. Both are likely to use AMOLED panels, though this isn't specified. The impact of this brightness difference is most noticeable outdoors, making the Edge 40 Neo slightly better for users who spend significant time in bright environments.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are marketed with a focus on camera capabilities, but the provided data doesn't offer specifics beyond 'Photo / Video'. The Redmi Note 12 Pro+ is known for its 200MP main sensor (not in provided data, but a key selling point), which allows for detailed images and significant cropping potential. The Edge 40 Neo’s camera system is likely more balanced, focusing on overall image quality rather than sheer megapixel count. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the Redmi’s higher resolution sensor gives it an edge in favorable lighting conditions.
Performance
The Redmi Note 12 Pro+ is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 1080, while the Edge 40 Neo utilizes the Dimensity 7030. Both are 6nm chips with an octa-core configuration (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 for the Redmi, and 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 for the Motorola). The Redmi’s slightly higher Cortex-A78 clock speed suggests a marginal performance advantage in CPU-intensive tasks, but in real-world usage, the difference will be minimal. Both phones likely utilize LPDDR4X RAM, impacting multitasking performance. Thermal management will be crucial; the Dimensity 1080's slightly higher peak performance could lead to more throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 12 Pro+ delivers a compelling battery package with a 10:38h active use score and an endurance rating of 88h, while the Edge 40 Neo achieves 10:28h and 80h respectively. The key differentiator is charging speed: the Redmi Note 12 Pro+ supports 120W wired charging, reaching 100% in just 19 minutes, while the Edge 40 Neo is limited to 68W, achieving 50% in 15 minutes. This difference is substantial, making the Redmi Note 12 Pro+ far more convenient for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ if you prioritize rapid charging, maximizing screen-on time, and a feature-rich camera experience. This phone is ideal for power users and those who frequently capture photos and videos. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you value a more refined design, a slightly brighter display, and a cleaner software experience, even if it means sacrificing some charging speed and overall battery endurance.