Redmi Note 12 Pro vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: Which Mid-Range Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro emerges as the winner. Its significantly longer battery endurance rating of 97 hours, coupled with 67W charging, provides a more reliable all-day experience than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s 80-hour rating and comparable charging.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, October 27 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, November 01 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163 x 76 x 8 mm (6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 187 g (6.60 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| IP53, dust and splash resistant | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 13 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 46 min | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Frosted Blue (Sky Blue), Onyx Black (Midnight Black), Polar White, Stardust Purple | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | 22101316C, 22101316I, 23013RK75C, 22101316G | XT2307-1 |
| Price | € 148.54 / $ 142.17 / £ 149.99 / ₹ 19,999 | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.06 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 97h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -26.6 LUFS (Good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 490526 (v9) GeekBench: 2209 (v5.1), 2372 (v6) GFXBench: 22fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro
- Superior battery life with 97-hour endurance rating
- Faster active use battery performance (12:08h)
- Slightly faster CPU clock speed
- Lower peak display brightness
- Camera specifications are unknown
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility (1073 nits)
- Potentially more efficient chipset architecture
- Sleek design and build quality
- Shorter battery life (80-hour endurance rating)
- Lower active use battery performance (10:28h)
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 1073 nits compared to the Redmi Note 12 Pro’s 890 nits. This difference is immediately noticeable in direct sunlight, making the Edge 40 Neo more readable outdoors. Both displays feature an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, but the higher peak brightness of the Motorola gives it an edge for HDR content. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the Redmi Note 12 Pro’s display technology isn’t specified, while the Edge 40 Neo’s brightness advantage is a clear win for outdoor visibility.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature capable camera systems, but detailed sensor information is lacking. Both are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but without specifics on megapixel counts or sensor sizes, a direct comparison is difficult. The absence of details suggests neither phone is aiming for flagship-level camera performance. The Edge 40 Neo’s marketing often highlights its camera, suggesting a potential focus on image processing and software enhancements. The Redmi Note 12 Pro’s camera performance will likely be solid, but without more data, it’s hard to assess its strengths and weaknesses.
Performance
Both phones are powered by MediaTek Dimensity chips fabricated on a 6nm process, but the Redmi Note 12 Pro utilizes the Dimensity 1080, featuring a slightly higher clocked Cortex-A78 core (2.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz on the Edge 40 Neo’s Dimensity 7030). In practice, this translates to a marginal performance advantage for the Redmi Note 12 Pro in CPU-intensive tasks. However, the Edge 40 Neo’s Dimensity 7030 benefits from newer architecture refinements, potentially offering better efficiency. Neither device’s RAM configuration is specified, but both are expected to offer sufficient memory for smooth multitasking. Thermal management will likely be similar given the comparable chipsets and process nodes.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro delivers a significant advantage in battery endurance, achieving a 97-hour rating compared to the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s 80-hour rating. Real-world testing confirms this, with the Redmi Note 12 Pro lasting 12:08 hours in active use, while the Edge 40 Neo manages 10:28 hours. Both support 67W/68W wired charging, offering a 50% charge in 15 minutes and a full charge in approximately 46 minutes for the Redmi Note 12 Pro. The Redmi Note 12 Pro’s larger battery capacity and optimized power efficiency translate to a more reliable and longer-lasting experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro if you need exceptional battery life and fast charging to power through demanding days. It’s ideal for users who frequently travel, stream media, or rely heavily on their phone for work. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prioritize a brighter, more vibrant display for media consumption and a slightly more premium aesthetic, and are willing to trade some battery endurance for it.