Xiaomi’s Redmi and Poco lines often overlap in the mid-range market, creating tough choices for consumers. The Redmi Note 12 Pro Speed focuses on a balanced experience with a proven chipset, while the Poco F5 Pro aims for near-flagship performance with the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Poco F5 Pro is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset delivers significantly faster performance, making it ideal for demanding games and applications. While both phones share 67W charging and similar battery endurance ratings, the F5 Pro’s processing power justifies the price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 27 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 27 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.9 x 76 x 7.9 mm (6.41 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| | IP53, dust and splash resistant | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, MIUI 14 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+ | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 15 min
30W wireless, 50% in 32 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Green | Black, White |
| Models | 22101320C | 23013PC75G |
| Price | About 230 EUR | $ 449.99 / € 241.85 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 1057977 (v9)
GeekBench: 4001 (v5.1), 4009 (v6)
GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro Speed
- More affordable price point
- Efficient Snapdragon 778G chipset for everyday tasks
- 67W fast charging support
- Significantly less powerful than the Poco F5 Pro
- Display brightness likely lower than the F5 Pro
- Lacks wireless charging
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
- Flagship-level Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 performance
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- 30W wireless charging support
- Higher price tag
- Potential for thermal throttling under extreme load (though mitigated by 4nm process)
- No significant camera hardware advantages specified
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 Pro boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1059 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Redmi Note 12 Pro Speed. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors. Both displays share an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting deep blacks. While panel technology details are missing for the Redmi Note 12 Pro Speed, the F5 Pro’s brightness advantage is a clear win for users who consume content in bright environments.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but specific details are lacking. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, given the Poco F5 Pro’s positioning as a more premium device, it’s reasonable to expect a more sophisticated camera system with potentially larger sensors and improved image processing. The absence of detail on both sides suggests a focus on software optimization rather than groundbreaking hardware. We can assume both will perform adequately in good lighting conditions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco F5 Pro’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) is a significant upgrade over the Redmi Note 12 Pro Speed’s Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm). The 8+ Gen 1 features a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.0 GHz, alongside three Cortex-A710 performance cores at 2.5 GHz, and four Cortex-A510 efficiency cores at 1.8 GHz. This contrasts with the 778G’s Cortex-A78 prime core at 2.4 GHz, three Cortex-A78 cores at 2.2 GHz, and four Cortex-A55 cores at 1.9 GHz. The 4nm process node of the 8+ Gen 1 also offers superior thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. The F5 Pro will handle graphically demanding games and multitasking with ease, while the 778G in the Note 12 Pro Speed is capable but will show its limitations.
Battery Life
Interestingly, both phones share an endurance rating of 99 hours, despite potentially different battery capacities (not specified). Both support 67W wired charging with PD3.0 and QC3+, capable of reaching 50% charge in 15 minutes on the Poco F5 Pro. The F5 Pro also adds 30W wireless charging, reaching 50% in 32 minutes, a feature absent on the Redmi Note 12 Pro Speed. The similar endurance ratings suggest efficient power management on both devices, but the Poco F5 Pro offers the convenience of wireless charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro Speed if you prioritize a smooth, reliable experience for everyday tasks and light gaming, and want to save money. It’s a great option for users who don’t need the absolute fastest performance. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro if you’re a power user, gamer, or frequently engage in resource-intensive activities like video editing. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 provides a substantial performance leap, making it a future-proof investment.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Poco F5 Pro get noticeably hot during extended gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is a powerful chip, it can generate heat under sustained load. However, the 4nm manufacturing process is more efficient than older nodes, helping to mitigate thermal throttling. Xiaomi likely incorporates cooling solutions within the F5 Pro to further manage temperatures, but some warmth is expected during prolonged gaming.
❓ Is the 67W charging on both phones truly fast, and how long does a full charge take?
67W charging is considered fast charging, capable of replenishing a battery quickly. Both phones can reach 50% charge in 15 minutes (Poco F5 Pro). A full 0-100% charge is estimated to take around 45-60 minutes, depending on the battery capacity (which isn't specified in the provided data).
❓ Does the Poco F5 Pro support high refresh rate gaming, and can it maintain stable frame rates in demanding titles like Genshin Impact?
While the display refresh rate isn't specified, the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is more than capable of driving high refresh rate displays. It should be able to maintain stable frame rates in Genshin Impact and other demanding games, though settings may need to be adjusted for optimal performance and thermal management.
