Xiaomi continues to dominate the mid-range smartphone market, and the Redmi Note 12 Pro Speed and the Poco F5 are prime examples. Both offer compelling features at competitive prices, but cater to slightly different users. This comprehensive comparison will help you determine which phone is the right fit for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F5 emerges as the clear winner thanks to its significantly faster Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset, brighter display, and impressive battery life. While the Redmi Note 12 Pro Speed offers a solid experience, the F5's performance and display elevate it to a higher tier.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 27 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 27 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.9 x 76 x 7.9 mm (6.41 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) | 161.1 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| | IP53, dust and splash resistant | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 68B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 725 |
| OS | Android 13, MIUI 14 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+ | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Green | Black, Blue, White |
| Models | 22101320C | 23049PCD8G, 23049PCD8I |
| Price | About 230 EUR | € 202.76 / $ 289.99 / ₹ 23,790 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 118h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.3 LUFS (Very good)
|
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro Speed
- Fast 67W charging
- Reliable performance
- Good value for money
- Sleek design
- Older chipset
- Less bright display
- Battery life could be better
Xiaomi Poco F5
- Powerful Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
- Bright and vibrant display
- Excellent battery life
- Fast charging
- Software experience can be polarizing
- Design might not appeal to everyone
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 boasts a significant advantage with its 963 nits max brightness, making it far more visible in direct sunlight. Its contrast ratio is also excellent. The Redmi Note 12 Pro Speed's display is good, but lacks the sheer vibrancy and outdoor visibility of the F5. Both likely use AMOLED panels, but the F5's implementation is superior.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but the Poco F5 likely has a slight edge in image processing and low-light performance due to the newer chipset. Both will likely offer similar primary sensor resolution (50MP), but the F5's ISP (Image Signal Processor) will be more advanced. Video recording capabilities should be comparable.
Performance
The Poco F5's Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 is a substantial upgrade over the Redmi Note 12 Pro Speed's Snapdragon 778G. Expect noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and significantly better gaming performance on the F5. The F5's CPU architecture is also more modern and efficient.
Battery Life
The Poco F5 demonstrates exceptional battery life, with an endurance rating of 118h and active use lasting over 11 hours. The Redmi Note 12 Pro Speed's battery life is respectable, but falls short of the F5's longevity. The F5's 67W charging is also slightly faster, reaching 100% in 46 minutes.
Buying Guide
The Redmi Note 12 Pro Speed is ideal for users prioritizing a balanced experience with reliable performance and fast charging. The Poco F5 is perfect for gamers, content creators, and anyone who demands top-tier performance and a vibrant display within a mid-range budget.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Poco F5 worth the extra money compared to the Redmi Note 12 Pro Speed?
Yes, if performance and display quality are your priorities. The Poco F5 offers a significant upgrade in both areas, justifying the price difference.
❓ Which phone has better software support?
Xiaomi typically provides consistent software updates for both lines, but Poco devices sometimes receive updates slightly later. MIUI on both is similar, but Poco often has a slightly cleaner experience.
