Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ vs Poco F5 Pro: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F5 Pro takes the crown thanks to its significantly faster Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset and brighter display. While the Redmi Note 12 Pro+ boasts incredibly fast 120W charging, the F5 Pro's overall performance and display quality make it the more desirable option for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ | Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International, China | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, October 27 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, November 01 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.9 x 76 x 8.9 mm (6.41 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 208.4 g (7.34 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| IP53, dust and splash resistant | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6877V Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 200 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4", 1.12µm 2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | - | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 19 min (advertised) | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 15 min 30W wireless, 50% in 32 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Arctic White, Iceberg Blue, Obsidian Black, Trend edition | Black, White |
| Models | 22101316UCP, 22101316UG | 23013PC75G |
| Price | $ 348.00 / £ 439.00 / € 399.00 / ₹ 29,949 | $ 449.99 / € 241.85 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 88h | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -26.7 LUFS (Good) | -26.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 498710 (v9) GeekBench: 2208 (v5.1), 2372 (v6) GFXBench: 22fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 1057977 (v9) GeekBench: 4001 (v5.1), 4009 (v6) GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+
- Incredibly fast 120W charging
- Solid overall performance
- Good value for money
- Excellent battery life
- Less powerful chipset than Poco F5 Pro
- Likely LCD display (less vibrant than AMOLED)
- Camera details are unclear
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
- Flagship-level Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset
- Bright and vibrant AMOLED display
- Excellent performance for gaming
- Good battery life
- Slower charging than Redmi Note 12 Pro+
- Camera details are unclear
- May lack some of the Redmi Note 12 Pro+'s features
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 Pro's display is a clear winner. It boasts a measured peak brightness of 1059 nits, significantly brighter than the Redmi Note 12 Pro+'s display. While both have 'infinite' contrast ratios (a nominal term), the F5 Pro's AMOLED panel offers richer colors and deeper blacks. The Redmi Note 12 Pro+ likely uses an LCD panel, which is still good, but not as impressive.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera comparisons are difficult without specific sensor and lens information. Generally, the Poco F5 Pro, with its more powerful processor, is likely to have better image processing capabilities, resulting in slightly better photos and videos, especially in low light. However, both are expected to deliver solid results for the price.
Performance
Here, the Poco F5 Pro absolutely dominates. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is a flagship-level chipset, offering significantly faster processing speeds and smoother multitasking compared to the Dimensity 1080 in the Redmi Note 12 Pro+. This difference is especially noticeable in demanding games and applications.
Battery Life
Both phones have excellent endurance ratings (88h and 99h respectively). The Redmi Note 12 Pro+’s 120W charging is a game-changer, allowing for incredibly fast top-ups. The Poco F5 Pro offers 67W wired and 30W wireless charging, which is still respectable but slower than the Redmi Note 12 Pro+.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ is ideal for users prioritizing incredibly fast charging and a generally well-rounded experience. The Poco F5 Pro is perfect for gamers, power users, and those who demand top-tier performance and a vibrant display, even if it means sacrificing some charging speed.