Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ vs Poco F4 GT: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and efficient charging, the Poco F4 GT is the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, despite potential thermal concerns, delivers a noticeable performance edge. However, the Redmi Note 11T Pro+ offers a compelling alternative for those seeking a more balanced experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ | Xiaomi Poco F4 GT |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 24 | 2022, April 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 31 | Available. Released 2022, April 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 74.3 x 8.9 mm (6.44 x 2.93 x 0.35 in) | 162.5 x 76.7 x 8.5 mm (6.40 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| - | Physical magnetic pop-up gaming triggers | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~407 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 650 nits (typ) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 13 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS 2 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, 120˚, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps, HDR |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by JBL | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 10 min, 100% in 19 min | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 17 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4400 mAh | Li-Po 4700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Silver, Black | Stealth Black, Knight Silver, Cyber Yellow |
| Models | 22041216UC | 21121210G |
| Price | About 300 EUR | € 227.11 / £ 339.99 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 81h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 952124 (v9) GeekBench: 3637 (v5.1) |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+
- More efficient chipset (Dimensity 8100, 5nm)
- Potentially better sustained performance due to thermal management
- Very fast 120W charging
- Less powerful chipset compared to Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
- Camera specs are unknown and likely less advanced
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
- Flagship-level performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
- Faster charging (17 minutes vs 19 minutes)
- Likely superior camera system
- Potential for thermal throttling under heavy load
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is less power efficient
Display Comparison
Both devices feature displays with an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting excellent black levels. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness and panel type (AMOLED vs. IPS) are missing. Given the Poco F4 GT’s positioning, it likely boasts a higher peak brightness for HDR content. The absence of refresh rate information is a key omission; assuming both are 120Hz, the Poco F4 GT might benefit from LTPO technology for variable refresh rate, improving battery life during static content viewing.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but specific details are absent. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, a direct comparison is impossible. However, given the Poco F4 GT’s flagship positioning, it likely features a more advanced camera system with a larger sensor and optical image stabilization. The Redmi Note 11T Pro+ likely focuses on providing a solid, all-around camera experience, but may lack the advanced features found in the Poco.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco F4 GT’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm) boasts a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.00 GHz, offering peak performance advantages over the Redmi Note 11T Pro+'s Dimensity 8100 (5nm). While the Dimensity 8100’s Cortex-A78 cores are clocked higher (2.85 GHz vs 2.50 GHz on the A710), the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1’s architecture and Adreno 730 GPU provide superior graphics processing. The 4nm process of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 *should* offer better efficiency, but its higher peak power draw is known to cause thermal throttling under sustained load. The Redmi Note 11T Pro+ benefits from the 5nm process, potentially leading to more consistent performance during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
Both devices share a 120W wired charging capability, with the Poco F4 GT achieving a full charge in 17 minutes compared to the Redmi Note 11T Pro+'s 19 minutes. Both support PD3.0. The Poco F4 GT also supports QC3. Both phones have an endurance rating of 81h, suggesting similar battery life despite potentially different battery capacities (which are not specified). The faster charging speed of the Poco F4 GT is a slight advantage, minimizing downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ if you need a phone that prioritizes efficient performance for everyday tasks and moderate gaming, coupled with incredibly fast 120W charging. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT if you prefer maximum gaming performance, are willing to manage potential thermal throttling, and value the fastest possible charging speeds alongside a flagship-level chipset.