The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ and vivo iQOO Neo 6 represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a premium experience without the flagship price tag, they take distinctly different approaches – Xiaomi prioritizing blazing-fast charging and a newer chipset, while vivo focuses on a refined gaming experience built around the established Snapdragon 870. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ emerges as the stronger contender. Its Mediatek Dimensity 8100 offers a performance edge over the Snapdragon 870, coupled with significantly faster 120W charging that replenishes the battery in under 20 minutes. While the iQOO Neo 6 boasts comparable battery endurance, the Redmi Note 11T Pro+'s speed and efficiency make it the better all-rounder.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 24 | 2022, May 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 31 | Available. Released 2022, May 31 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 74.3 x 8.9 mm (6.44 x 2.93 x 0.35 in) | 163 x 76.2 x 8.5 mm (6.42 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~407 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 650 nits (typ) | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 13 | Android 12, Funtouch 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, 120˚, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 10 min, 100% in 19 min | 80W wired, 50% in 12 min, 100% in 32 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4400 mAh | 4700 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Silver, Black | Dark Nova, Cyber Rage |
| Models | 22041216UC | I2126 |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 360 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 97h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.0 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 627246 (v8), 730223 (v9)
GeekBench: 3076 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+
- Significantly faster 120W charging
- More efficient Dimensity 8100 chipset
- Potentially better thermal management
- Display specifications currently unknown
- Camera details are limited
vivo iQOO Neo 6
- Proven Snapdragon 870 performance
- Good battery endurance (97h)
- Mature software experience (likely)
- Slower 80W charging
- Less efficient 7nm process
- Potentially more throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
The iQOO Neo 6 boasts a measured peak brightness of 772 nits, a respectable figure, but the Redmi Note 11T Pro+'s display specifications are currently unavailable for direct comparison. However, given Xiaomi’s recent focus on display quality, it’s reasonable to expect a similarly bright panel. Both devices likely feature an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, typical of AMOLED displays. Without knowing the Redmi Note 11T Pro+'s refresh rate and PWM dimming frequency, it's difficult to assess potential eye strain differences, but this is a key area for further investigation.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without knowing sensor sizes, aperture values, or image processing algorithms, a direct comparison is challenging. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device would be a significant advantage, particularly for low-light photography and video recording. It’s likely both phones include a primary wide-angle lens and potentially an ultrawide, but the quality of these sensors will dictate real-world performance. The inclusion of a 2MP macro lens on either device is unlikely to significantly impact the overall camera experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Redmi Note 11T Pro+ utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 8100, fabricated on a 5nm process, offering a theoretical performance advantage over the iQOO Neo 6’s 7nm Snapdragon 870. The Dimensity 8100’s octa-core configuration (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) promises faster processing speeds, particularly in demanding tasks. While the Snapdragon 870 (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) remains a capable performer, the 5nm node of the Dimensity 8100 translates to improved thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions. Both devices likely utilize LPDDR5 RAM, but the Redmi Note 11T Pro+ may benefit from faster RAM speeds depending on the specific implementation.
Battery Life
Both the Redmi Note 11T Pro+ and iQOO Neo 6 achieve an endurance rating of 97 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under typical usage. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Redmi Note 11T Pro+ supports 120W wired charging, achieving 50% charge in just 10 minutes and a full charge in 19 minutes. The iQOO Neo 6, with its 80W charging, takes 12 minutes to reach 50% and 32 minutes for a complete charge. This difference is substantial, making the Redmi Note 11T Pro+ significantly more convenient for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ if you prioritize rapid charging, future-proofed performance with the Dimensity 8100, and demand the quickest possible turnaround from empty to full. Buy the vivo iQOO Neo 6 if you value a proven gaming platform with the Snapdragon 870, and prefer a slightly more mature software experience, and aren't as concerned about achieving the absolute fastest charging speeds.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 8100 in the Redmi Note 11T Pro+ generate excessive heat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 8100's 5nm process is designed for improved thermal efficiency compared to the Snapdragon 870's 7nm process. While gaming will inevitably generate heat, the Redmi Note 11T Pro+ is likely to experience less throttling and maintain higher frame rates for longer periods, assuming adequate cooling solutions are implemented.
❓ Is the 80W charging on the iQOO Neo 6 still considered fast compared to other smartphones?
80W charging is undeniably fast and significantly quicker than standard charging speeds. However, the Redmi Note 11T Pro+'s 120W charging represents a substantial leap forward, reducing charging times by over 10 minutes for a full charge. While 80W is still convenient, the 120W option offers a level of speed that many users will find highly desirable.
❓ How does the software experience differ between Xiaomi's MIUI and vivo's Funtouch OS?
MIUI is known for its extensive customization options and feature set, but can sometimes be perceived as bloated. Funtouch OS, while improving in recent years, historically has been criticized for its heavier skin and less intuitive interface. User preference plays a significant role here, but many find Funtouch OS to be more refined and less intrusive than MIUI.
