Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ vs Realme GT Neo 3T: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ emerges as the stronger choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 8100 offers a performance edge over the Snapdragon 870 in the GT Neo 3T, and the significantly faster 120W charging is a game-changer. While battery endurance is similar, the Redmi’s charging speed provides a practical advantage.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ | Realme GT Neo 3T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 24 | 2022, June 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 31 | Available. Released 2022, June 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 74.3 x 8.9 mm (6.44 x 2.93 x 0.35 in) | 162.9 x 75.8 x 8.7 mm (6.41 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 194.5 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~407 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 650 nits (typ) | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 13 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, 120˚, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 10 min, 100% in 19 min | 80W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4400 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Silver, Black | Shade Black, Drifting White, Dash Yellow |
| Models | 22041216UC | RMX3372, RMX3371 |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 780 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 118h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 726007 (v9) GeekBench: 3180 (v5.1) GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+
- Significantly faster 120W charging
- More powerful Mediatek Dimensity 8100 chipset
- Potentially better thermal management due to 5nm process
- Display specifications currently unknown
- Camera details are limited
Realme GT Neo 3T
- Known 803 nits peak brightness
- Established brand reputation in gaming
- Solid Snapdragon 870 performance
- Slower 80W charging
- Less powerful chipset compared to the Dimensity 8100
Display Comparison
The Realme GT Neo 3T boasts a measured peak brightness of 803 nits, a respectable figure for outdoor visibility. However, the Redmi Note 11T Pro+’s display specifications are currently unavailable, making a direct brightness comparison difficult. Both devices feature an 'infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, typical of AMOLED panels. Without knowing the Redmi’s panel technology (LTPO or standard AMOLED) or refresh rate, it’s hard to definitively declare a winner, but the GT Neo 3T’s brightness is a known quantity.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without knowing sensor sizes, aperture values, or image processing algorithms, a meaningful comparison is challenging. The absence of specific details suggests neither phone is positioned as a camera-centric flagship. We can assume both will deliver acceptable results in good lighting conditions, but low-light performance will likely be a differentiating factor dependent on sensor size and software optimization. Ignoring the typical 2MP macro lens found on both, the main sensor quality will be the deciding factor.
Performance
This is where the core difference lies. The Redmi Note 11T Pro+ is powered by the Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5nm), featuring an octa-core CPU with a high clock speed of 2.85 GHz for its Cortex-A78 cores. This 5nm process node offers superior power efficiency compared to the 7nm Snapdragon 870 (SM8250-AC) in the Realme GT Neo 3T. While the Snapdragon 870’s Kryo 585 cores reach 3.2 GHz, the Dimensity 8100’s architecture and node advantage translate to better sustained performance and thermal management, particularly during extended gaming sessions. The Redmi will likely exhibit less throttling under load. The GT Neo 3T still provides a very capable experience, but the Redmi has the edge.
Battery Life
Both the Redmi Note 11T Pro+ and Realme GT Neo 3T share an endurance rating of 118 hours, suggesting similar battery life under typical usage. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Redmi Note 11T Pro+ supports 120W wired charging, capable of reaching 50% charge in just 10 minutes and a full charge in 19 minutes. The Realme GT Neo 3T’s 80W charging is significantly slower. This difference in charging speed is a major advantage for the Redmi, minimizing downtime and offering a more convenient user experience. While the battery capacity isn't specified for the Redmi, the faster charging mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ if you prioritize raw performance for gaming and demanding applications, and value the convenience of incredibly fast charging. You'll benefit from a more responsive experience and less downtime. Buy the Realme GT Neo 3T if you prefer a slightly more established brand reputation within the gaming community and are content with a solid, but not class-leading, performance profile, and a more moderate 80W charging solution.