Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ vs Motorola Edge 30 Neo: A Deep Dive Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing performance and rapid charging, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 8100 chipset significantly outperforms the Snapdragon 695 in the Motorola Edge 30 Neo, making it ideal for gaming and demanding tasks. However, the Edge 30 Neo offers a more refined design and comparable battery life despite a slower charging speed.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ | Motorola Edge 30 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 24 | 2022, September 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 31 | Available. Released 2022, October 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 74.3 x 8.9 mm (6.44 x 2.93 x 0.35 in) | 152.9 x 71.2 x 7.8 mm (6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 155 g (5.47 oz) |
| - | Splash and dust resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~407 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~419 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.28 inches, 95.2 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 650 nits (typ) | P-OLED, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 13 | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 64 MP, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, 120˚, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps | 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 10 min, 100% in 19 min | 68W wired 5W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4400 mAh | Li-Po 4020 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Silver, Black | Very Peri, Black Onyx, Ice Palace, Aqua Foam |
| Models | 22041216UC | XT2245-1 |
| Price | About 300 EUR | € 156.44 / $ 185.00 / £ 229.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 104h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 380818 (v9) GeekBench: 1964 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+
- Significantly faster charging (120W)
- More powerful processor (Dimensity 8100)
- Potentially better gaming performance
- Battery capacity not specified
- Display specifications limited
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
- Sleek and compact design
- Good battery endurance (104h rating)
- High peak display brightness (1004 nits)
- Less powerful processor (Snapdragon 695)
- Slower charging speeds (68W wired)
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo boasts a measured peak brightness of 1004 nits, suggesting excellent outdoor visibility. While the Redmi Note 11T Pro+’s display specifications are not provided, the Edge 30 Neo’s infinite contrast ratio (nominal) indicates a likely OLED panel, offering deep blacks and vibrant colors. The absence of refresh rate data for the Redmi Note 11T Pro+ is a notable omission, potentially impacting smoothness compared to the Edge 30 Neo if the latter features a higher refresh rate. Bezels are likely comparable given the market segment, but the Edge 30 Neo’s design language emphasizes a more premium aesthetic.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Redmi Note 11T Pro+’s positioning suggests a focus on overall camera performance, potentially featuring a larger main sensor. The Edge 30 Neo likely prioritizes a balanced camera system suitable for social media and casual photography. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to significantly impact image quality and should be considered a secondary feature.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Redmi Note 11T Pro+ utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5nm), while the Motorola Edge 30 Neo features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm). The Dimensity 8100’s octa-core configuration (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) provides a substantial performance advantage over the Snapdragon 695’s (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver). The 5nm process node of the Dimensity 8100 also contributes to better power efficiency and thermal management, potentially leading to sustained performance during extended gaming sessions. The Edge 30 Neo’s Snapdragon 695 is sufficient for everyday tasks, but will struggle with graphically intensive applications compared to the Redmi Note 11T Pro+.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo boasts an endurance rating of 104 hours, indicating solid battery life. The Redmi Note 11T Pro+’s battery capacity is not specified, but its 120W wired charging capability is a significant advantage. This allows for a 50% charge in just 10 minutes and a full charge in 19 minutes. The Edge 30 Neo’s 68W wired and 5W wireless charging are considerably slower. While the Edge 30 Neo’s endurance rating suggests comparable real-world usage, the Redmi Note 11T Pro+’s charging speed mitigates any potential battery capacity disadvantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ if you need uncompromising performance for gaming, video editing, or multitasking, and value the ability to fully charge your phone in under 20 minutes. Buy the Motorola Edge 30 Neo if you prefer a more compact and stylish design, prioritize a balanced user experience, and don't require the absolute fastest processing speeds.