Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro vs Poco X5 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and sustained gaming, the Redmi Note 11T Pro is the clear winner thanks to its Dimensity 8100 chipset. However, the Poco X5 Pro offers a very competitive package with a brighter display and comparable battery life, making it a strong contender for everyday users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro | Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 24 | 2023, February 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 31 | Available. Released 2023, February 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 74.3 x 8.9 mm (6.44 x 2.93 x 0.35 in) | 162.9 x 76 x 7.9 mm (6.41 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| IP53, dust and splash resistant | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~407 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 650 nits (typ) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 13 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 for POCO |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, 120˚, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.2 (Intl), 5.1 (India), A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band - India |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0 | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 45 min 5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5080 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Silver, Black | Astral Black, Horizon Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | 22041216C | 22101320G, 22101320I |
| Price | About 250 EUR | € 156.00 / $ 221.33 / ₹ 22,490 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 113h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.9 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 531398 (v9) GeekBench: 2930 (v5.1) GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro
- Superior CPU performance with the Dimensity 8100
- More efficient 5nm manufacturing process
- Potentially better sustained gaming performance
- Display brightness is unknown and likely lower than the Poco X5 Pro
- Camera specifications are not detailed
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
- Brighter 912 nit display for outdoor visibility
- QC4 charging support in addition to PD3.0
- 5W reverse wired charging
- Less powerful Snapdragon 778G chipset
- 6nm process node may result in more heat generation
Display Comparison
The Poco X5 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 912 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Redmi Note 11T Pro. This makes the X5 Pro more usable in direct sunlight. Both displays share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting they are both IPS LCD panels. While the Redmi Note 11T Pro’s display specs are missing, the X5 Pro’s brightness advantage is a tangible benefit for outdoor users. The lack of LTPO technology on either device means refresh rate scaling isn't as power-efficient as on flagship models.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are absent. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the market positioning, it’s likely the Redmi Note 11T Pro may prioritize image processing for detail, while the Poco X5 Pro might lean towards a more vibrant, social-media-friendly look. The absence of details suggests neither phone is targeting camera enthusiasts.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Redmi Note 11T Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5nm) is a substantial step up from the Poco X5 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm). The Dimensity 8100 features a more powerful CPU configuration – four Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.85 GHz versus the X5 Pro’s single 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 and three 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores. The 5nm process node of the Dimensity 8100 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially leading to less throttling during extended gaming sessions. While the Snapdragon 778G is no slouch, the Dimensity 8100 offers a noticeable performance advantage in CPU-intensive tasks and graphically demanding games.
Battery Life
Both devices share a 67W wired charging capability with support for PD3.0. The Poco X5 Pro adds QC4 support and claims a 100% charge in 45 minutes, while the Note 11T Pro’s charging time is unspecified. Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 113 hours, indicating similar real-world battery life despite potentially different battery capacities. The Poco X5 Pro also offers 5W reverse wired charging, a convenient feature for topping up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro if you need uncompromising performance for demanding games and applications, and value a chipset known for its efficiency. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro if you prefer a brighter display for outdoor visibility, appreciate the convenience of QC4 charging alongside PD3.0, and prioritize a balanced experience over absolute top-end speed.