Xiaomi offers a plethora of mid-range smartphones, making it tough to pick the perfect one. The Redmi Note 11T Pro and Poco X4 GT are both compelling options, boasting impressive specs and competitive pricing. But which one reigns supreme?
🏆 Quick Verdict
Both phones share the same Dimensity 8100 chipset, ensuring excellent performance. The Poco X4 GT edges out slightly with faster charging and potentially a more vibrant display, while the Redmi Note 11T Pro might offer a more refined overall experience depending on specific features and software updates. It's a close call!
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 24 | 2022, June 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 31 | Available. Released 2022, June 27 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 74.3 x 8.9 mm (6.44 x 2.93 x 0.35 in) | 163.6 x 74.3 x 8.9 mm (6.44 x 2.93 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 200 g (7.05 oz) |
| | IP53, dust and splash resistant | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~407 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~407 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 650 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 144Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 650 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 13 | Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Triple | 64 MP, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, 120˚, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.9 (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0 | 67W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5080 mAh | Li-Po 5080 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Silver, Black | Black, Blue, Silver |
| Models | 22041216C | 22041216G, 22041216UG |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 240 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.92 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 112h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1190:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.4 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 747871 (v9)
GeekBench: 3719 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 46fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro
- Potentially better software experience
- Higher resolution main camera (108MP)
- Refined design (subjective)
- Good overall balance of features
- Slower charging speed
- Potentially slightly less bright display
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
- Faster charging (46 mins to 100%)
- Potentially brighter display
- Gaming-focused design
- Excellent battery life (112h endurance rating)
- Aggressive design (subjective)
- Potentially less refined software
Display Comparison
Both devices feature a 6.67-inch AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate and a 1190:1 contrast ratio. The Poco X4 GT is reported to have a slightly higher peak brightness (600 nits measured), potentially offering better visibility in direct sunlight. The Redmi Note 11T Pro may have slightly better color accuracy, but this is often subjective and dependent on calibration.
Camera Comparison
The Redmi Note 11T Pro typically features a 108MP main camera, an 8MP ultrawide, and a 2MP macro lens. The Poco X4 GT often has a 64MP main camera, an 8MP ultrawide, and a 2MP macro lens. While megapixels aren't everything, the Redmi Note 11T Pro's higher resolution main sensor *could* offer slightly more detail in well-lit conditions. Both phones record video up to 4K resolution. Image processing and color science will differ between the two, so sample photos are crucial for comparison.
Performance
Performance is virtually identical. Both phones are powered by the Mediatek Dimensity 8100 chipset and Octa-core CPU. Expect smooth multitasking, responsive gaming, and effortless handling of everyday tasks. The Poco X4 GT might have slightly better thermal management due to its design, preventing throttling during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
The Poco X4 GT boasts an impressive endurance rating of 112 hours, suggesting excellent battery life. Both phones have a 67W wired charging capability, but the Poco X4 GT charges to 100% in just 46 minutes, significantly faster than the Redmi Note 11T Pro. The Redmi Note 11T Pro's battery capacity is likely around 5080mAh, while the Poco X4 GT's is around 5000mAh.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro is ideal for users prioritizing a balanced experience with a potentially better software ecosystem and slightly more refined design. The Poco X4 GT is a great choice for gamers and power users who value fast charging and a potentially brighter display, and are comfortable with a more aggressive, gaming-focused aesthetic.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Poco X4 GT is generally considered better for gaming due to its potentially superior thermal management and faster charging, allowing for longer play sessions.
❓ Does the Redmi Note 11T Pro have NFC?
Yes, the Redmi Note 11T Pro typically includes NFC for contactless payments and other functionalities. Check the specific variant for confirmation.
