The Realme GT Neo 5 240W and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro represent distinct approaches to delivering a premium smartphone experience. The Realme aggressively prioritizes charging speed and raw processing power, while the Xiaomi focuses on a balanced package with a strong emphasis on efficiency. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing ultimate charging speed and peak performance, the Realme GT Neo 5 240W is the clear winner. However, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro offers a more refined, thermally managed experience and excellent value for those less concerned with absolute top-end specs.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 24 | 2023, February 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 31 | Available. Released 2023, February 09 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 74.3 x 8.9 mm (6.44 x 2.93 x 0.35 in) | 163.9 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| | IP53, dust and splash resistant | Illuminated RGB (on the back) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~407 ppi density) | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 650 nits (typ) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 13 | Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, 120˚, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP, f/3.3, 20mm (microscope) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (dual side) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0 | 240W wired, 50% in 4 min, 100% in 10 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5080 mAh | 4600 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Silver, Black | Purple, Black, White |
| Models | 22041216C | RMX3708 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 440 EUR |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro
- Faster 67W charging offers convenient top-ups.
- Dimensity 8100 provides excellent performance for the price.
- Potentially better thermal management due to the 5nm process.
- Significantly slower charging compared to the Realme GT Neo 5.
- Less powerful processor than the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1.
Realme GT Neo 5 240W
- Industry-leading 240W charging for incredibly fast refills.
- Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 delivers top-tier performance.
- Likely superior image processing capabilities.
- Potential for thermal throttling under heavy load.
- May exhibit shorter battery life during intensive use.
Display Comparison
While both devices likely feature high refresh rate AMOLED displays (data not provided), the core difference lies in the underlying processors impacting display responsiveness. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Realme GT Neo 5, with its Adreno 730 GPU, should deliver a slightly smoother experience in graphically intensive applications. However, without specific display specs like peak brightness or PWM dimming frequency, a definitive judgment is difficult. The Realme's processing power could also enable more advanced display features like HDR10+ support, if implemented.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Realme GT Neo 5, positioned as a higher-tier device, likely incorporates a more advanced camera system. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) offers superior image processing capabilities, potentially resulting in better dynamic range and low-light performance. The Redmi Note 11T Pro will likely focus on delivering solid, reliable images, but may lack the advanced features and processing power of the Realme. We can assume both phones will have a primary camera, but the Realme is more likely to have OIS (Optical Image Stabilization).
Performance
The Realme GT Neo 5 240W boasts the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm), a significant step up from the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro’s MediaTek Dimensity 8100 (5nm). The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s Cortex-X2 prime core, clocked at 3.19 GHz, provides a noticeable advantage in single-core performance, crucial for responsive UI and app loading. The Dimensity 8100, while still powerful, relies on four Cortex-A78 cores at 2.85 GHz. The 4nm process of the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 also contributes to better power efficiency, but the Realme’s higher peak performance may lead to more thermal throttling under sustained load. The Realme’s LPDDR5X RAM (assumed) will further enhance performance compared to the Redmi Note 11T Pro’s likely LPDDR5.
Battery Life
The Realme GT Neo 5 240W’s headline feature is its revolutionary 240W charging, capable of reaching 100% in just 10 minutes. This dramatically reduces downtime compared to the Redmi Note 11T Pro’s 67W charging. While the Redmi Note 11T Pro’s battery capacity (not specified) may be larger, the Realme’s charging speed effectively mitigates any capacity disadvantage. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s improved efficiency partially offsets its higher power draw, but the Redmi Note 11T Pro’s Dimensity 8100 will likely offer longer battery life during moderate usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro if you need a consistently smooth experience, value thermal efficiency for extended gaming sessions, and prefer a more balanced approach to features. Buy the Realme GT Neo 5 240W if you prioritize the absolute fastest charging available, demand maximum CPU performance for demanding tasks, and are willing to accept potentially higher temperatures during sustained load.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Realme GT Neo 5 240W's battery degrade quickly due to the extreme charging speed?
While 240W charging is incredibly fast, Realme has implemented multiple safety measures, including GaN chargers and specialized battery technology, to minimize heat generation and prevent rapid battery degradation. However, long-term battery health will still be affected over years of use, as with any lithium-ion battery.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Realme GT Neo 5 240W overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is known to generate heat under sustained load. The Realme GT Neo 5 240W likely incorporates a robust cooling system to mitigate this, but some thermal throttling is still possible during extended gaming. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro’s Dimensity 8100, being more efficient, will likely maintain lower temperatures.
❓ Is the 67W charging on the Redmi Note 11T Pro still considered fast charging in 2024?
While 67W is still a respectable charging speed, it's significantly slower than the 240W offered by the Realme GT Neo 5. It will take considerably longer to fully charge the Redmi Note 11T Pro, making it less convenient for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
