Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: Which Mid-Range Champion Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing peak performance and demanding tasks, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro is the clear winner, thanks to its Dimensity 8100 chipset. However, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo excels in battery life and display quality, making it a better choice for everyday users who value longevity and visual fidelity.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 24 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 31 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 74.3 x 8.9 mm (6.44 x 2.93 x 0.35 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| IP53, dust and splash resistant | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~407 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 650 nits (typ) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 13 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, 120˚, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0 | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5080 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Silver, Black | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | 22041216C | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro
- Superior processing power with Dimensity 8100
- Faster CPU clock speeds for demanding tasks
- 67W fast charging with PD3.0 support
- Likely lower battery life compared to Edge 40 Neo
- Display brightness likely inferior to Edge 40 Neo
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Exceptional battery life (10:28h active use)
- Brighter display (1073 nits)
- More efficient Dimensity 7030 chipset
- Lower peak performance compared to Dimensity 8100
- CPU clock speeds are lower
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1073 nits, compared to an unspecified peak brightness for the Redmi Note 11T Pro. This translates to superior visibility under direct sunlight. While panel technology isn't specified for either, the Edge 40 Neo's higher brightness suggests a more advanced panel. Bezels are likely comparable given the market segment, but the Edge 40 Neo’s overall display experience is likely more pleasing due to the brightness advantage.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera analysis is limited by the provided data. Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but specifics are missing. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the market positioning suggests the Redmi Note 11T Pro might prioritize camera features slightly more, potentially offering a more versatile camera system. The Edge 40 Neo likely focuses on software optimization for image quality. We can assume both phones will have a standard set of camera modes, but the 11T Pro may have a slight edge in low-light performance due to its more powerful ISP.
Performance
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5nm) holds a clear advantage over the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s Dimensity 7030 (6nm) in raw processing power. The 8100 features a more powerful CPU configuration – four Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.85 GHz versus the 7030’s 2.5 GHz. The 5nm fabrication process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. While the 7030 is more efficient, the 8100 delivers superior performance for demanding applications and gaming. The 7030’s 6nm process is more efficient, but the core count and clock speed difference are substantial.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shines in battery endurance, achieving 10:28 hours of active use and an impressive 80-hour endurance rating. While the Redmi Note 11T Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, the Edge 40 Neo’s efficiency, coupled with its 68W charging (50% in 15 minutes), provides a significant advantage. Both phones offer fast charging, with the Redmi Note 11T Pro’s 67W charging and PD3.0 support being competitive, but the Edge 40 Neo’s real-world battery performance is demonstrably superior.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro if you need uncompromising processing power for gaming, video editing, or multitasking. Its 67W charging is also a boon for quick top-ups. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prefer a phone with exceptional battery life, a brighter and more vibrant display, and a more streamlined software experience, even if it means sacrificing some raw horsepower.