Xiaomi offers a plethora of smartphones, making it tough to pick the right one. The Redmi Note 11T Pro+ and Poco X4 GT are both compelling mid-range options, but cater to slightly different needs. This comprehensive comparison will break down their strengths and weaknesses to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Redmi Note 11T Pro+ takes the crown for its blazing-fast 120W charging and potentially slightly better display. However, the Poco X4 GT offers exceptional battery life and a competitive price, making it a strong contender for budget-conscious users. It's a close call, depending on your priorities.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 24 | 2022, June 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 31 | Available. Released 2022, June 27 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 74.3 x 8.9 mm (6.44 x 2.93 x 0.35 in) | 163.6 x 74.3 x 8.9 mm (6.44 x 2.93 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 200 g (7.05 oz) |
| | IP53, dust and splash resistant | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~407 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~407 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 650 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 144Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 650 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 13 | Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Triple | 64 MP, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, 120˚, (ultrawide)
2 MP, (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.9 (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | - | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, color spectrum | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 10 min, 100% in 19 min (advertised) | 67W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4400 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5080 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Silver, Black | Black, Blue, Silver |
| Models | 22041216UC | 22041216G, 22041216UG |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 240 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.92 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 112h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1190:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.4 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 747871 (v9)
GeekBench: 3719 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 46fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+
- Blazing-fast 120W charging
- Potentially better display quality
- Versatile camera system (expected)
- Smooth 120Hz AMOLED display
- Higher price
- Battery life not as impressive as Poco X4 GT
- Potential for thermal throttling under heavy load
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
- Exceptional battery life (112h endurance)
- Competitive price
- Smooth 120Hz display
- Decent performance
- Slower charging speed (67W)
- Potentially less impressive camera
- Display brightness may be lower
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.67-inch AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate and a 1190:1 contrast ratio. However, the Redmi Note 11T Pro+ is likely to have slightly better color accuracy and potentially a higher peak brightness, offering a more immersive viewing experience. The Poco X4 GT's measured 600 nits brightness is respectable, but the Note 11T Pro+ likely edges it out.
Camera Comparison
The Redmi Note 11T Pro+ is expected to have a more versatile camera system, potentially including a higher resolution main sensor and improved image processing. The Poco X4 GT's camera is still capable, but may not offer the same level of detail or dynamic range. Specific camera specs are missing, so a direct comparison is difficult, but the Note 11T Pro+ is generally considered to have a slight advantage.
Performance
Both devices are powered by the Mediatek Dimensity 8100 chipset, ensuring smooth performance for everyday tasks and gaming. While the core specs are identical, software optimization and thermal management could lead to slight differences in real-world performance. Expect similar speeds in most scenarios.
Battery Life
This is where the Poco X4 GT shines. Its endurance rating of 112h is significantly higher than the Redmi Note 11T Pro+. While the Note 11T Pro+ boasts incredibly fast 120W charging (fully charging in around 19 minutes), the Poco X4 GT's larger battery capacity provides longer usage time between charges. The Poco X4 GT charges at 67W, taking approximately 46 minutes for a full charge.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ is ideal for users who prioritize fast charging, a vibrant display, and don't mind spending a bit more. The Xiaomi Poco X4 GT is perfect for those seeking long battery life, a good all-around performer, and a more affordable price point.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Redmi Note 11T Pro+ worth the extra money?
If fast charging and a potentially better display are your priorities, then yes. However, if battery life and value are more important, the Poco X4 GT is a compelling alternative.
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
Both phones offer good gaming performance thanks to the Dimensity 8100 chipset. However, the Redmi Note 11T Pro+'s potentially better cooling system might allow for sustained performance over longer gaming sessions.
