Xiaomi’s Redmi Note 11T 5G and Poco F4 both aim for the competitive mid-range market, but cater to slightly different priorities. The Note 11T 5G focuses on 5G connectivity and affordability, while the Poco F4 steps up the performance with a flagship-level chipset. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which device delivers the best experience for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco F4 is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 870 chipset provides a substantial performance boost over the Redmi Note 11T 5G’s Dimensity 810, and the 67W charging significantly reduces downtime. While the Note 11T 5G offers good value, the F4’s extra power justifies the price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 30 | 2022, June 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 07 | Available. Released 2022, June 27 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 75.8 x 8.8 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 163.2 x 76 x 7.7 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| | IP53, dust and splash resistant | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 900 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14.2 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, 119˚, (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide) 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 100% in 60 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 38 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Aquamarine Blue, Stardust White, Matte Black | Moonlight Silver, Night Black, Nebula Green |
| Models | 21091116AI | 22021211RG, 22021211RI |
| Price | About 220 EUR | ₹ 16,999 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 101h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 590961 (v8), 698586 (v9)
GeekBench: 3190 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T 5G
- More affordable price point
- Good 5G connectivity
- Decent battery life
- Less powerful processor
- Slower charging speed
- Likely inferior camera performance
Xiaomi Poco F4
- Significantly faster processor (Snapdragon 870)
- Much faster charging (67W)
- Brighter and potentially higher quality display
- Higher price tag
- Potentially slightly lower battery endurance due to higher power draw
Display Comparison
The Poco F4 boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 1003 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Redmi Note 11T 5G. This translates to better visibility outdoors. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels (based on Xiaomi’s typical offerings), the F4’s higher peak brightness and infinite contrast ratio suggest a more vibrant and immersive viewing experience. Bezels are likely comparable, but the F4’s overall display quality is a clear advantage.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed sensor information is missing. However, given the Poco F4’s positioning, it likely incorporates a more sophisticated camera system with a larger main sensor and potentially optical image stabilization (OIS). The Snapdragon 870’s image signal processor (ISP) also offers superior image processing capabilities. While the Redmi Note 11T 5G can capture decent photos in good lighting, the Poco F4 is expected to deliver better dynamic range, low-light performance, and video quality. We can assume both phones include standard features like portrait mode and night mode, but the F4 will likely execute these features more effectively.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco F4’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm) is a significant upgrade over the Redmi Note 11T 5G’s MediaTek Dimensity 810 (6nm). The Snapdragon 870’s octa-core configuration, with a prime core clocked at 3.2 GHz, delivers substantially faster CPU and GPU performance. The Dimensity 810, while capable for everyday tasks, will struggle with graphically intensive games and demanding applications. The Snapdragon 870’s more mature 7nm process also suggests better thermal management, potentially leading to less throttling during sustained workloads. The F4 benefits from faster RAM speeds (likely LPDDR5) compared to the Note 11T 5G (likely LPDDR4X).
Battery Life
Both devices have an endurance rating of 101 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life despite the Poco F4’s more powerful processor. This indicates efficient power management on both sides. However, the Poco F4’s 67W wired charging with PD3.0 and QC3 support is a game-changer, achieving a full charge in just 38 minutes. The Redmi Note 11T 5G’s 33W charging takes a comparatively slow 60 minutes. This faster charging speed significantly reduces downtime and provides a more convenient user experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T 5G if you prioritize 5G connectivity on a tight budget and don’t require demanding gaming performance. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F4 if you value faster processing speeds for gaming, multitasking, and content creation, and appreciate significantly quicker charging times. The F4 is the better option for power users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 870 in the Poco F4 overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 870 is known for its excellent thermal efficiency. While some heat generation is inevitable during intense gaming, the 7nm process and Xiaomi’s cooling solutions should prevent significant throttling, allowing for sustained performance. The Note 11T 5G's Dimensity 810 may throttle sooner under similar load.
❓ Is the difference in charging speed between the 33W and 67W chargers truly noticeable in everyday use?
Absolutely. The Poco F4’s 67W charging can top up the battery from 0% to 100% in just 38 minutes, while the Redmi Note 11T 5G takes 60 minutes. This 22-minute difference is significant, especially for users who frequently need to quickly recharge their phones.
❓ Does the Poco F4 support higher refresh rate displays compared to the Redmi Note 11T 5G?
While not explicitly stated in the provided data, the Poco F4 is highly likely to feature a 120Hz display, a common feature in phones with Snapdragon 870 chipsets. The Redmi Note 11T 5G likely has a standard 60Hz display. A higher refresh rate results in smoother scrolling and animations.
