The Xiaomi Redmi Note series consistently delivers excellent value, and the 11S and 11 Pro are no exception. Both offer compelling features at mid-range prices, but key differences exist. This comprehensive comparison will break down each phone's strengths and weaknesses to help you make the right choice.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Redmi Note 11 Pro takes the crown thanks to its significantly faster 67W charging and generally improved overall package. While the 11S boasts slightly better battery endurance on paper, the Pro's charging speed makes it the more practical choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 26 | 2022, January 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, February 09 | Available. Released 2022, February 18 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 73.9 x 8.1 mm (6.30 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | IP53, dust and splash resistant | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 700 nits, 1000 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 13 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | Virtual proximity sensing | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 58 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 51% in 15 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Graphite Gray, Pearl White, Twilight Blue | Graphite Gray (Stealth Black), Polar White (Phantom White), Star Blue |
| Models | 2201117SG, 2201117SI, 2201117SY, 2201117SL | 2201116TG, 2201116TI |
| Price | € 136.99 | € 121.46 / £ 169.57 |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.05 W/kg (body) | 1.08 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.88 W/kg (body) | 0.58 W/kg (head) 0.86 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 133h
|
Endurance rating 100h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-25.4 LUFS (Very good)
|
-24.4 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 251201 (v8), 308741 (v9)
GeekBench: 1873 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 12fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 261309 (v8), 319093 (v9)
GeekBench: 1729 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 12fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
- Excellent battery life (on paper)
- Slightly more affordable
- Good display quality
- Slower charging speed
- Potentially less versatile camera
- Helio G96 chipset isn't top-tier
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro
- Significantly faster charging (67W)
- Potentially better camera system
- Slightly more premium design
- Slightly shorter battery life (on paper)
- Slightly more expensive
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.43-inch Super AMOLED display with a 90Hz refresh rate, offering vibrant colors and smooth scrolling. The measured brightness is nearly identical (744 nits vs 746 nits), making them equally visible outdoors. The 'Infinite' contrast ratio is a nominal value, typical of AMOLED panels, indicating excellent black levels and contrast.
Camera Comparison
While both have 'Photo / Video' listed, the Redmi Note 11 Pro generally features a more versatile camera system. It typically includes a higher resolution main sensor (108MP vs 108MP on the 11S, though sensor size and image processing are crucial), an ultrawide lens, a macro lens, and a depth sensor. The 11S often has a slightly better selfie camera. Image quality will depend heavily on software optimization and processing.
Performance
Both devices share the same Mediatek Helio G96 chipset and CPU configuration. Performance will be very similar in everyday tasks and most games. However, the Pro's potentially better thermal management (due to slightly improved design) might allow it to sustain peak performance for longer periods.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 11S has a slightly higher endurance rating (133h) compared to the Redmi Note 11 Pro (100h). However, the 11 Pro's 67W charging is a game-changer, allowing it to charge from 0% to 51% in just 15 minutes, while the 11S's 33W charging takes considerably longer.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S is ideal for users prioritizing maximum battery life and a slightly more affordable price point. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is the better choice for those who value fast charging, a potentially better camera system (depending on software updates), and a slightly more premium feel.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Redmi Note 11 Pro worth the extra money?
If fast charging and a potentially better camera are important to you, then yes. The 67W charging is a significant advantage.
❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
Both phones offer similar gaming performance thanks to the same chipset. However, the Pro might maintain performance better over longer gaming sessions due to potentially better thermal management.
