Xiaomi consistently delivers compelling value in the mid-range smartphone market. The Redmi Note 11S and Poco X4 Pro 5G represent two distinct approaches to achieving this, with the Note 11S prioritizing a potentially brighter display and the X4 Pro 5G focusing on 5G connectivity and significantly faster charging. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Poco X4 Pro 5G is the better buy. While the Redmi Note 11S boasts a brighter display at 744 nits, the X4 Pro 5G’s more efficient Snapdragon 695 chipset and blazing-fast 67W charging – reaching 100% in just 41 minutes – offer a more compelling overall experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 26 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, February 09 | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 73.9 x 8.1 mm (6.30 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | IP53, dust and splash resistant | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 700 nits, 1000 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 13 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version
64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | Virtual proximity sensing | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 58 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Graphite Gray, Pearl White, Twilight Blue | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | 2201117SG, 2201117SI, 2201117SY, 2201117SL | 2201116PG |
| Price | € 136.99 | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.05 W/kg (body) | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.88 W/kg (body) | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 133h
|
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-25.4 LUFS (Very good)
|
-26.8 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 251201 (v8), 308741 (v9)
GeekBench: 1873 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 12fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9)
GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility (744 nits)
- Slightly longer battery endurance rating (133h)
- Potentially lower price point (depending on retailer)
- Less power-efficient chipset (Helio G96, 12nm)
- Slower charging speed (33W, 58 minutes to 100%)
- Lacks 5G connectivity
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- Faster charging (67W, 41 minutes to 100%)
- More power-efficient chipset (Snapdragon 695, 6nm)
- 5G connectivity for future-proofing
- Likely better sustained performance
- Slightly lower battery endurance rating (119h)
- Lower peak display brightness (unspecified, likely lower than 744 nits)
- Potentially higher price point
Display Comparison
Both the Redmi Note 11S and Poco X4 Pro 5G feature displays with an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting deep blacks. However, the Redmi Note 11S pulls ahead with a measured peak brightness of 744 nits, making it more legible under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels (though not explicitly stated), the Note 11S’s higher brightness is a tangible advantage for outdoor users. The lack of information on refresh rates or PWM dimming frequencies prevents a complete assessment of display quality, but the brightness difference is a key differentiator.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are absent. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a direct comparison is impossible. However, given Xiaomi’s typical strategy, the Poco X4 Pro 5G likely benefits from more advanced image processing algorithms, leveraging Qualcomm’s ISP. The absence of information suggests neither phone will excel in low-light photography, and the inclusion of a 2MP macro lens on either device is likely a marketing gimmick with limited practical value.
Performance
The chipset is where these phones diverge significantly. The Poco X4 Pro 5G utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm), while the Redmi Note 11S features the MediaTek Helio G96 (12nm). The Snapdragon 695, built on a smaller 6nm process, offers superior power efficiency and generally better sustained performance compared to the 12nm Helio G96. The X4 Pro 5G’s CPU, with 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold cores, also has a clock speed advantage over the Note 11S’s 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 cores. This translates to snappier app loading and smoother multitasking, particularly for users engaging in more demanding tasks. The 5G modem in the X4 Pro 5G is another benefit for those in areas with 5G coverage.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 11S boasts an endurance rating of 133 hours, while the Poco X4 Pro 5G trails slightly at 119 hours. However, this difference is largely offset by the X4 Pro 5G’s significantly faster 67W charging. The Note 11S takes 58 minutes to reach 100% with its 33W charger, whereas the X4 Pro 5G achieves 70% in just 22 minutes and a full charge in 41 minutes. This charging speed advantage is a major convenience factor, allowing users to quickly top up their battery when needed. The Snapdragon 695’s efficiency also contributes to mitigating the slightly lower endurance rating.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S if you prioritize maximum display brightness for outdoor visibility and are less concerned with 5G connectivity or rapid charging. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you value faster charging speeds, 5G support for future-proofing, and a more power-efficient chipset for extended battery life, even if it means a slightly lower endurance rating.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the Poco X4 Pro 5G struggle with graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact?
While the Snapdragon 695 isn't a flagship chipset, it's capable of running Genshin Impact at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. Expect some frame drops during intense combat scenarios. The 6nm process and improved thermal management compared to the Helio G96 in the Redmi Note 11S will help maintain performance for longer periods.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Poco X4 Pro 5G compared to the 33W charging on the Redmi Note 11S in real-world use?
The difference is substantial. The Poco X4 Pro 5G can gain a significant charge during a short coffee break – reaching 70% in just 22 minutes. The Redmi Note 11S, with its 33W charging, requires nearly an hour to reach a full charge. This makes the X4 Pro 5G ideal for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery.
❓ Is the 5G connectivity on the Poco X4 Pro 5G worth the extra cost if I don't have 5G coverage in my area?
Even without immediate 5G access, the Poco X4 Pro 5G offers future-proofing. As 5G networks expand, you'll be ready to take advantage of faster speeds. Additionally, the Snapdragon 695 chipset generally offers better 4G performance and efficiency compared to the Helio G96.
