Realme 9 Pro+ vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S: Which Mid-Range Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and faster charging, the Realme 9 Pro+ is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 920 chipset offers a significant upgrade over the Redmi Note 11S's Helio G96. However, the Redmi Note 11S remains a strong contender for those seeking extended battery life and a more affordable option.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S | Realme 9 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 26 | 2022, February 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, February 09 | Available. Released 2022, February 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 73.9 x 8.1 mm (6.30 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) | 160.2 x 73.3 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 182 g (6.42 oz) |
| IP53, dust and splash resistant | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 700 nits, 1000 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 920 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 13 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 58 min | 60W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 44 min (advertised) |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Graphite Gray, Pearl White, Twilight Blue | Midnight Black, Aurora Green, Sunrise Blue, Free Fire Limited Edition |
| Models | 2201117SG, 2201117SI, 2201117SY, 2201117SL | RMX3392, RMX3393 |
| Price | € 136.99 | € 289.90 / $ 390.00 / ₹ 25,999 |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.05 W/kg (body) | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.73 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.88 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 133h | Endurance rating 117h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -25.4 LUFS (Very good) | -25.3 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 251201 (v8), 308741 (v9) GeekBench: 1873 (v5.1) GFXBench: 12fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 495096 (v8), 416031 (v9) GeekBench: 2335 (v5.1) GFXBench: 27fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
- Faster charging with 33W support and PD3.0/QC3 compatibility.
- Longer battery life with a 133-hour endurance rating.
- Potentially better outdoor visibility with 744 nits peak brightness.
- Less powerful chipset (Helio G96) compared to the Dimensity 920.
- May struggle with demanding games and applications.
Realme 9 Pro+
- Significantly faster performance with the Mediatek Dimensity 920 chipset.
- Faster 60W charging, reaching 100% in 44 minutes.
- More efficient 6nm process for potentially better thermal management.
- Shorter battery life with a 117-hour endurance rating.
- Potentially higher price point compared to the Redmi Note 11S.
Display Comparison
Both the Realme 9 Pro+ and Redmi Note 11S feature displays with an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, typical for modern LCD/OLED panels. However, the Redmi Note 11S boasts a measured peak brightness of 744 nits, suggesting a potentially more visible screen outdoors in direct sunlight. While both likely utilize similar panel technologies, the Redmi Note 11S’s higher brightness gives it an edge in usability under bright conditions. Details regarding refresh rates and panel type (IPS vs AMOLED) are missing, but given the price points, IPS LCDs are likely on both devices.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, and features like Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) are absent. Without this information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market positioning suggests the Realme 9 Pro+ may feature a more advanced camera system, potentially with a larger main sensor and more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The Redmi Note 11S likely focuses on providing a versatile camera experience at a lower price point, potentially sacrificing some image quality in low-light conditions.
Performance
The core difference between these two phones lies in their chipsets. The Realme 9 Pro+ utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 920, fabricated on a more efficient 6nm process, featuring a more powerful CPU configuration with 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores alongside 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This contrasts with the Redmi Note 11S’s Mediatek Helio G96 (12nm), which has 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The 6nm process and faster A78 cores in the Dimensity 920 translate to noticeably improved CPU and GPU performance, making the Realme 9 Pro+ better suited for gaming and demanding applications. The Redmi Note 11S will handle everyday tasks adequately, but will struggle with graphically intensive games at higher settings.
Battery Life
The Realme 9 Pro+ offers 60W wired charging, promising a full charge in 44 minutes (advertised), while the Redmi Note 11S supports 33W charging, taking 58 minutes to reach 100%. This is a significant difference in charging speed. However, the Redmi Note 11S boasts an endurance rating of 133 hours, compared to the Realme 9 Pro+'s 117 hours. This suggests the Redmi Note 11S has a larger battery capacity, offsetting the slower charging speed with longer overall usage time. The more efficient Dimensity 920 in the Realme 9 Pro+ attempts to mitigate the battery life difference, but the Redmi Note 11S still holds an advantage in pure endurance.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S if you need a phone that can reliably last a full day on a single charge and value affordability above all else. It’s ideal for everyday tasks, social media, and casual gaming. Buy the Realme 9 Pro+ if you prefer a smoother, more responsive experience for demanding apps, gaming, and appreciate significantly faster 60W charging, even if it means slightly reduced battery endurance.