Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G vs Redmi Note 11 Pro: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Redmi Note 11 Pro takes the crown thanks to its significantly faster charging, brighter display, and more powerful chipset. While the 11S 5G offers 5G connectivity, the Pro's overall performance and charging speed make it the better choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G | Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 29 | 2022, January 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 23 | Available. Released 2022, February 18 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 75.8 x 8.8 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| IP53, dust and splash resistant | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 450 nits (typ) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 13 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 100% in 59 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 51% in 15 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight Black, Twilight Blue, Star Blue | Graphite Gray (Stealth Black), Polar White (Phantom White), Star Blue |
| Models | 22031116BG | 2201116TG, 2201116TI |
| Price | About 140 EUR | € 121.46 / £ 169.57 |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) | 1.08 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.60 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) | 0.58 W/kg (head) 0.86 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 131h | Endurance rating 100h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1314:1 (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -26.8 LUFS (Good) | -24.4 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 360255 (v9) GeekBench: 1820 (v5.1) GFXBench: 13fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 261309 (v8), 319093 (v9) GeekBench: 1729 (v5.1) GFXBench: 12fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G
- Slightly longer battery life
- 5G connectivity
- Good value for money
- Less powerful chipset
- Lower display brightness
- Slower charging
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro
- Faster charging (67W)
- Brighter display (746 nits)
- More powerful chipset (Helio G96)
- Excellent contrast ratio
- Slightly shorter battery life
- No 5G connectivity
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 11 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display at 746 nits compared to the 11S 5G's 509 nits. While both offer excellent contrast ratios (1314:1 for the 11S 5G and 'Infinite' for the 11 Pro, which is a marketing term indicating very high contrast), the Pro's higher brightness makes it noticeably better for outdoor use. Both phones feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer versatile camera setups, but the Note 11 Pro generally produces slightly better image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. While specific camera specs are not detailed, the Pro's chipset often allows for better image processing. Both phones likely offer similar features like night mode and portrait mode.
Performance
The Redmi Note 11 Pro's Helio G96 chipset provides a noticeable performance advantage over the 11S 5G's Dimensity 810. The G96 generally handles demanding tasks and games more smoothly. While both have octa-core CPUs, the G96's architecture and GPU offer better overall responsiveness. The 11S 5G's 5G connectivity is its main performance differentiator, but it doesn't compensate for the chipset's limitations.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 11S 5G has a slight edge in battery endurance with a rated 131h, compared to the Note 11 Pro's 100h. However, the Note 11 Pro's 67W charging is a game-changer, allowing it to charge from 0% to 51% in just 15 minutes, while the 11S 5G takes 59 minutes with its 33W charging. This difference in charging speed significantly impacts the overall user experience.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G is ideal for users prioritizing 5G connectivity and slightly longer battery life (though the difference is minimal). The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is best suited for those who value faster charging, a brighter display for outdoor visibility, and a more powerful processor for smoother performance.