Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G vs Poco M4 Pro 5G: A Head-to-Head Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Redmi Note 11S 5G edges out the Poco M4 Pro 5G primarily due to its slightly better battery life and potentially more refined software experience. Both offer similar performance thanks to the Dimensity 810, but the Redmi's endurance gives it a slight advantage for all-day use.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G | Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 29 | 2021, November 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 23 | Available. Released 2021, November 11 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 75.8 x 8.8 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 163.6 x 75.8 x 8.8 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| IP53, dust and splash resistant | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 450 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 13 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | Panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 100% in 59 min | 33W wired, 100% in 59 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight Black, Twilight Blue, Star Blue | Poco Yellow, Power Black, Cool Blue |
| Models | 22031116BG | 21091116AG, MZB0BGVIN |
| Price | About 140 EUR | About 150 EUR |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) | 1.07 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.60 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) | 0.59 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 131h | Endurance rating 123h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1314:1 (nominal) | Contrast ratio: 1553:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -26.8 LUFS (Good) | -24.9 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 360255 (v9) GeekBench: 1820 (v5.1) GFXBench: 13fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 296721 (v8), 353663 (v9) GeekBench: 1797 (v5.1) GFXBench: 13fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G
- Slightly better battery life
- Potentially more refined MIUI software
- Good display quality
- Camera performance can be inconsistent
- Design might be less appealing to some
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
- Attractive design
- Good video recording capabilities
- Competitive price
- Slightly shorter battery life
- Software experience can be less polished
Display Comparison
Both phones feature vibrant displays with excellent contrast ratios (1314:1 and 1553:1 respectively). Peak brightness is nearly identical at 509-510 nits, ensuring good visibility even in bright sunlight. The Poco M4 Pro 5G's slightly higher contrast ratio might offer marginally better image depth, but the difference is likely subtle.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is a key area where differences can emerge. While both are advertised as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, detailed camera reviews suggest the Redmi Note 11S 5G might offer slightly better image processing and dynamic range. The Poco M4 Pro 5G often excels in video recording, potentially offering better stabilization. Further testing is needed for a definitive verdict.
Performance
Powering both devices is the Mediatek Dimensity 810 chipset, ensuring comparable performance for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. Expect smooth multitasking and responsive app loading. While neither phone is a powerhouse, they handle most tasks with ease. Real-world performance differences will be minimal.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 11S 5G holds a slight advantage in battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 131 hours compared to the Poco M4 Pro 5G's 123 hours. This translates to potentially longer usage between charges, a crucial factor for many users.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G is ideal for users prioritizing battery life and a potentially more polished MIUI experience. The Poco M4 Pro 5G is a great choice for those seeking a balance of features and value, particularly if design aesthetics are a key factor.