Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A23 5G: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A23 5G edges out the Redmi Note 11S 5G thanks to its slightly better battery life and slower charging, but overall more consistent performance and Samsung's software support. The Redmi Note 11S 5G offers a faster charging experience, but falls slightly short in other areas.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G | Samsung Galaxy A23 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 2, 5, 30, 66, 77 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 29 | 2022, August 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 23 | Available. Released 2022, September 02 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 75.8 x 8.8 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 165.4 x 76.9 x 8.4 mm (6.51 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 197 g (6.95 oz) |
| IP53, dust and splash resistant | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 450 nits (typ) | PLS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 13 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS 5 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm - USA 8 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm - International |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio (market/region dependent) |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| Virtual proximity sensing | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 100% in 59 min | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight Black, Twilight Blue, Star Blue | Black, White, Peach, Blue |
| Models | 22031116BG | SM-A236U, SM-A236U1, SM-A236B, SM-A236B/DS, SM-A236B/DSN, SM-A236E, SM-S236DL |
| Price | About 140 EUR | $ 84.44 / £ 129.00 / € 125.28 / ₹ 21,000 |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) | 0.68 W/kg (head) 0.57 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.60 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) | 1.49 W/kg (head) 1.25 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 131h | Endurance rating 138h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1314:1 (nominal) | Contrast ratio: 1328:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -26.8 LUFS (Good) | -25.9 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 360255 (v9) GeekBench: 1820 (v5.1) GFXBench: 13fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 318821 (v9) GeekBench: 1940 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G
- Faster Charging (33W)
- Slightly more powerful chipset (Dimensity 810)
- Good value for money
- Slightly shorter battery life
- Software updates may be less frequent
- Camera processing can be overly saturated
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
- Longer battery life
- Samsung's One UI software (polished and feature-rich)
- Reliable performance
- Generally better camera processing
- Slower charging (25W)
- Chipset slightly less powerful than Redmi
- Can be slightly more expensive
Display Comparison
Both phones feature vibrant displays with excellent contrast ratios (1314:1 for Redmi, 1328:1 for Galaxy A23). While the measured brightness is nearly identical (509 nits for Redmi, 508 nits for Galaxy A23), the Galaxy A23 5G's display might offer slightly better color accuracy due to Samsung's display tuning. Both use AMOLED panels, providing deep blacks and vivid colors.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is subjective. The Redmi Note 11S 5G typically offers slightly more saturated colors, while the Galaxy A23 5G aims for a more natural look. Both phones feature versatile camera setups, including a main sensor, ultrawide, macro, and depth sensor. Low-light performance is comparable, but Samsung's image processing might produce slightly more usable results.
Performance
The Redmi Note 11S 5G utilizes a Mediatek Dimensity 810, which generally offers slightly better raw processing power, particularly for gaming. However, the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G's Snapdragon 695 5G is known for its efficiency and consistent performance under sustained load. Real-world performance differences are likely to be minimal for everyday tasks.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A23 5G boasts a slightly better endurance rating (138h vs 131h), suggesting it will last a bit longer on a single charge. However, the Redmi Note 11S 5G charges significantly faster with its 33W wired charging (59 minutes for 100%) compared to the Galaxy A23 5G's 25W charging.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G is ideal for users prioritizing fast charging and a slightly more powerful chipset for gaming. The Samsung Galaxy A23 5G is a better choice for those who value longer battery life, a more polished software experience, and a generally more reliable all-around performer.