Xiaomi Redmi Note 11E vs Poco M4 Pro 5G: Which Budget 5G Phone Wins?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Poco M4 Pro 5G emerges as the stronger choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 810 chipset provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Note 11E’s Dimensity 700, and the 33W fast charging significantly reduces downtime. While both offer similar battery endurance, the Poco’s faster charging is a key advantage.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi Note 11E | Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 02 | 2021, November 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 18 | Available. Released 2021, November 11 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164 x 76.1 x 8.9 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) | 163.6 x 75.8 x 8.8 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 13 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 5 MP | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired, 100% in 59 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, Silver, Atlantic Blue | Poco Yellow, Power Black, Cool Blue |
| Models | 22041219C | 21091116AG, MZB0BGVIN |
| Price | About 170 EUR | About 150 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.07 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 123h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1553:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.9 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 296721 (v8), 353663 (v9) GeekBench: 1797 (v5.1) GFXBench: 13fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11E
- More affordable price point
- Reliable Mediatek Dimensity 700 chipset for basic tasks
- Decent battery life
- Slower 18W charging
- Less powerful chipset compared to the Poco M4 Pro 5G
- Potentially lower peak display brightness
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
- Faster Mediatek Dimensity 810 chipset
- Significantly faster 33W charging (full charge in 59 minutes)
- Brighter display (510 nits)
- Slightly higher price
- Similar battery life to the Redmi Note 11E
- May experience more thermal throttling under heavy load
Display Comparison
Both phones share a contrast ratio of 1553:1, suggesting similar panel characteristics in terms of black levels. However, the Poco M4 Pro 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 510 nits, offering a more visible display in outdoor conditions. While neither phone specifies panel technology (IPS vs AMOLED), the brightness difference suggests the Poco M4 Pro 5G may have a slightly more advanced display capable of handling HDR content better. Bezels are likely comparable given their similar price points, and color accuracy is expected to be typical for this segment – adequate but not professional-grade.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, lacking specific details. However, given the market positioning, expect similar camera performance. Focusing on the chipset's ISP capabilities, the Dimensity 810 in the Poco M4 Pro 5G likely offers slightly better image processing and noise reduction. The absence of details regarding sensor size and aperture makes a definitive comparison impossible, but the Poco’s more powerful chipset suggests a marginal advantage in image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on both is largely a marketing tactic and unlikely to deliver significant photographic value.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco M4 Pro 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6nm) is a step up from the Redmi Note 11E’s Dimensity 700 (7nm). The Dimensity 810 features faster Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz versus 2.2 GHz on the 700, resulting in a roughly 10-15% performance increase in CPU-intensive tasks. The 6nm process also contributes to improved power efficiency. While both phones likely utilize LPDDR4X RAM, the chipset advantage gives the Poco M4 Pro 5G a clear edge in gaming and multitasking. Thermal management will be crucial; the 6nm node of the Dimensity 810 should help mitigate throttling during extended use.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 123 hours, indicating comparable battery life under typical usage. However, the Poco M4 Pro 5G’s 33W wired charging is a game-changer, achieving a full charge in just 59 minutes. The Redmi Note 11E’s 18W charging is considerably slower, requiring significantly more time to replenish the battery. This difference in charging speed translates to a more convenient user experience, especially for those who frequently use their phones throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11E if you prioritize a simple, reliable 5G experience and are on a very tight budget. It’s ideal for users who primarily browse, use social media, and make occasional calls. Buy the Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G if you prefer a more responsive device for gaming, multitasking, and content creation, and value the convenience of significantly faster charging speeds. It’s the better option for power users and those who demand more from their smartphone.