The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11E and vivo T1 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive budget 5G smartphone market. Both aim to deliver 5G connectivity and a smooth user experience without breaking the bank, but they achieve this through different approaches, primarily in their chipset choices. This comparison dissects those differences and helps you determine which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and potential future-proofing, the vivo T1 5G emerges as the slightly better choice. Its Snapdragon 695 (or Dimensity 810 in some regions) built on a 6nm process generally offers a performance advantage over the Redmi Note 11E’s Dimensity 700, despite both phones sharing 18W charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 77, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 1, 3, 40 SA/NSA - Indonesia |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 02 | 2022, February 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 18 | Available. Released 2022, February 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164 x 76.1 x 8.9 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) | 164 x 75.8 x 8.3 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 187 g (6.60 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - Indonesia |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) - Indonesia |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619Mali-G57 MC2 - Indonesia |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 13 | Android 11, Funtouch 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 - India |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 5 MP | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray, Silver, Atlantic Blue | Starlight Black, Rainbow Fantasy |
| Models | 22041219C | V2141, V2157 |
| Price | About 170 EUR | About 180 EUR |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11E
- Proven Dimensity 700 chipset offers reliable performance.
- Generally available and well-supported.
- Competitive price point.
- 7nm process may lead to more thermal throttling under sustained load.
- Potentially less future-proof compared to newer chipsets.
vivo T1 5G
- Snapdragon 695 (or Dimensity 810) offers a potential performance boost.
- 6nm process improves power efficiency.
- May offer a smoother gaming experience.
- Chipset variant varies by region (Snapdragon vs Dimensity).
- Software support may vary depending on region.
Display Comparison
Neither Xiaomi nor vivo provide detailed display specifications in the provided data. Assuming typical LCD panels for this price bracket, the display experience will likely be similar. However, the absence of information regarding refresh rates, peak brightness, and color gamut makes a definitive comparison impossible. Users should look for independent reviews to assess display quality.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor information, a camera comparison is limited. Both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup, but the quality will depend heavily on the primary sensor and image processing algorithms. The absence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device suggests reliance on software stabilization. Users should focus on independent camera reviews to assess real-world image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Redmi Note 11E utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 700, fabricated on a 7nm process. This is paired with an octa-core CPU configuration featuring two Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz. The vivo T1 5G, however, offers two options: the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) and the Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6nm) in Indonesia. The Snapdragon 695 features Kryo 660 Gold and Silver cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and 1.7 GHz respectively. The Dimensity 810 boasts faster Cortex-A76 cores at 2.4 GHz. The 6nm process used in the Snapdragon 695 and Dimensity 810 generally translates to better power efficiency and potentially less thermal throttling compared to the 7nm Dimensity 700, offering a performance advantage in sustained workloads. The Dimensity 810 variant of the T1 5G will likely offer the best performance.
Battery Life
Both the Redmi Note 11E and vivo T1 5G are equipped with 18W wired charging. While the charging speed is identical, the efficiency of the chipset plays a role. The 6nm process of the Snapdragon 695 and Dimensity 810 in the T1 5G *could* translate to slightly better battery life, even with a similar battery capacity (which isn't specified in the provided data). Expect roughly similar 0-100% charging times, around 2-3 hours, given the 18W limitation.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11E if you need a reliable, everyday phone with a proven chipset and are less concerned with pushing the boundaries of mobile gaming. Buy the vivo T1 5G if you prioritize a potentially smoother experience with more demanding apps and games, and potentially benefit from the more efficient 6nm process, especially if you live in a region with the Dimensity 810 variant.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the vivo T1 5G get noticeably hotter than the Dimensity 700 during extended gaming sessions?
While both chipsets can heat up during prolonged gaming, the Snapdragon 695's 6nm process generally leads to better thermal efficiency. This means it's likely to maintain peak performance for longer before throttling, resulting in a more consistent gaming experience compared to the Redmi Note 11E's 7nm Dimensity 700.
❓ If I live in Indonesia, is the Dimensity 810 version of the vivo T1 5G significantly better than the Redmi Note 11E?
Yes, the Dimensity 810 variant of the vivo T1 5G offers a noticeable performance improvement over the Redmi Note 11E's Dimensity 700. The higher clock speeds of the Cortex-A76 cores in the Dimensity 810, combined with the 6nm process, will result in faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance.
❓ Will I see a significant difference in 5G speeds between these two phones?
The 5G speeds will be more dependent on your carrier and network conditions than the chipset itself. Both the Dimensity 700 and Snapdragon 695 support 5G connectivity, but the Snapdragon 695 may have slightly better modem efficiency, potentially leading to marginally improved signal reception in fringe areas.
