Xiaomi Redmi Note 11E vs Samsung Galaxy A23 5G: A Detailed Comparison of Budget 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing faster charging and a slightly brighter display, the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G is the better choice. However, the Redmi Note 11E’s Dimensity 700, built on a smaller 7nm process, may offer better sustained performance and thermal management during extended use, making it preferable for moderate gamers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi Note 11E | Samsung Galaxy A23 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 2, 5, 30, 66, 77 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 02 | 2022, August 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 18 | Available. Released 2022, September 02 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164 x 76.1 x 8.9 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) | 165.4 x 76.9 x 8.4 mm (6.51 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 197 g (6.95 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | PLS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 13 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS 5 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 5 MP | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 5 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm - USA 8 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm - International |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio (market/region dependent) |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, Silver, Atlantic Blue | Black, White, Peach, Blue |
| Models | 22041219C | SM-A236U, SM-A236U1, SM-A236B, SM-A236B/DS, SM-A236B/DSN, SM-A236E, SM-S236DL |
| Price | About 170 EUR | $ 84.44 / £ 129.00 / € 125.28 / ₹ 21,000 |
| SAR | - | 0.68 W/kg (head) 0.57 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.49 W/kg (head) 1.25 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 138h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1328:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.9 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 318821 (v9) GeekBench: 1940 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11E
- Potentially better sustained performance due to Dimensity 700’s thermal characteristics.
- 7nm process may offer better efficiency under heavy load.
- Competitive price point.
- Slower 18W charging.
- Display likely less bright than the A23 5G.
- Limited detailed specifications available.
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
- Faster 25W wired charging.
- Brighter display (508 nits).
- Samsung brand recognition and software support.
- Snapdragon 695 may throttle more under sustained load.
- 6nm process doesn't guarantee superior real-world efficiency.
- 2MP macro camera is likely of limited use.
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A23 5G boasts a display capable of reaching 508 nits of peak brightness, a measurable advantage over what we’d expect from the Redmi Note 11E. Both displays share a 1328:1 contrast ratio, suggesting similar black levels and color depth. While neither phone features a high refresh rate panel, the A23’s higher brightness makes it more usable in direct sunlight. The lack of detailed display specs for the Redmi Note 11E means we can only infer its performance will be adequate, but likely not as vibrant as the A23.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are equipped with photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specs are absent. Given the market segment, we can expect similar image quality in good lighting conditions. The absence of information regarding sensor size and aperture makes a direct comparison difficult. It’s likely both phones rely heavily on software processing to enhance image quality. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on the A23 is a common, but often underwhelming, feature in this price range, offering limited practical benefit.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Redmi Note 11E utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7nm), while the Galaxy A23 5G features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm). While both CPUs feature a 2x2.2 GHz prime core configuration, the Snapdragon 695’s 6nm process *should* offer improved power efficiency. However, the Dimensity 700’s 7nm process, coupled with potentially more aggressive thermal design in the Redmi Note 11E, could translate to less throttling under sustained load. The Snapdragon 695’s Kryo 660 Gold cores are architecturally similar to the Cortex-A76 in the Dimensity 700, suggesting comparable peak performance, but the 6nm node gives Qualcomm an edge in efficiency.
Battery Life
Both the Redmi Note 11E and Galaxy A23 5G achieve an endurance rating of 138 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the Galaxy A23 5G’s 25W wired charging significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 11E’s 18W charging. This translates to a faster 0-100% charge time for the A23, a crucial advantage for users who prioritize quick top-ups. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed of the A23 5G is a clear win.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11E if you prioritize sustained performance during gaming or prolonged app usage and are comfortable with slower 18W charging. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G if you value faster 25W charging, a slightly brighter display for outdoor visibility, and the Samsung brand ecosystem. Both phones are excellent choices for basic smartphone tasks, but their strengths diverge when pushed.