The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11E and Oppo K10x represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive budget 5G smartphone market. Both aim to deliver 5G connectivity and a smooth user experience without breaking the bank, but they take different approaches to achieving this. The Redmi Note 11E focuses on a balanced feature set with a Mediatek Dimensity 700, while the Oppo K10x prioritizes rapid charging with a Qualcomm Snapdragon 695.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing convenience and quick top-ups, the Oppo K10x is the better choice. Its 67W charging significantly reduces downtime, offsetting the slightly less efficient chipset. However, users heavily invested in the Xiaomi ecosystem or seeking a potentially cooler-running device might prefer the Redmi Note 11E.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 02 | 2022, September 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 18 | Available. Released 2022, September 22 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164 x 76.1 x 8.9 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) | 164.3 x 75.6 x 8.5 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 13 | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 67W wired, 80% in 33 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray, Silver, Atlantic Blue | Blue, Black |
| Models | 22041219C | PGGM10 |
| Price | About 170 EUR | About 210 EUR |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11E
- Proven Dimensity 700 chipset offers reliable performance.
- Potentially better thermal management due to the 7nm process.
- Strong Xiaomi ecosystem integration.
- Significantly slower 18W charging.
- Less efficient chipset compared to the Snapdragon 695.
Oppo K10x
- Blazing-fast 67W charging for minimal downtime.
- More efficient Snapdragon 695 chipset (6nm).
- Potentially better GPU performance for gaming.
- May run slightly warmer under sustained load.
- Oppo’s ColorOS may not appeal to all users.
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Given the context data focuses on internals, we can infer both likely feature standard 6.5-6.6 inch LCD panels common in this price bracket. The absence of information regarding refresh rates suggests both are likely 60Hz. The real difference will come down to color calibration and peak brightness, which are not specified. However, the K10x’s slightly higher price point *might* translate to a marginally better panel.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. Both phones likely feature a primary camera, ultrawide, and depth sensor configuration typical of this segment. The image processing algorithms will be a key differentiator. Oppo generally leans towards more vibrant, saturated images, while Xiaomi often aims for a more natural look. The Snapdragon 695’s ISP *may* offer slightly better image processing capabilities, but this is highly dependent on software optimization.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo K10x’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (6nm) benefits from a more modern fabrication process compared to the Redmi Note 11E’s Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7nm). While both CPUs feature a 2x2.2 GHz prime core configuration, the Snapdragon 695’s Kryo 660 Gold cores are architecturally more efficient than the Cortex-A76 in the Dimensity 700. This translates to better power efficiency and potentially sustained performance. The Dimensity 700, however, has a strong track record for stable performance in everyday tasks. The K10x’s Adreno 619 GPU is also likely to offer a slight edge in gaming performance over the Dimensity 700’s Mali-G57 MC2.
Battery Life
The Oppo K10x’s 67W charging is a game-changer. Achieving 80% charge in just 33 minutes is a significant advantage over the Redmi Note 11E’s 18W charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed effectively mitigates any potential capacity difference. Users who frequently find themselves needing to top up their phone will greatly benefit from the K10x’s charging speed.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11E if you need a reliable all-rounder with a proven chipset and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. It’s ideal for users who prioritize consistent performance over rapid refueling. Buy the Oppo K10x if you prefer blazing-fast 67W charging, minimizing downtime and maximizing usability, even if it means potentially slightly lower sustained performance under heavy load.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the Oppo K10x overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 695 is more efficient than the Dimensity 700, sustained gaming will inevitably generate heat. However, Qualcomm’s thermal management features and the 6nm process should mitigate overheating better than the 7nm Dimensity 700, preventing significant performance throttling. Expect playable frame rates, but not necessarily at maximum settings for extended periods.
❓ Is the difference in charging speed between 18W and 67W really that noticeable in everyday use?
Absolutely. 18W charging typically takes over 2 hours for a full charge. 67W charging can get you from 0 to 80% in just 33 minutes. This is a massive difference for users who frequently need to top up their phone throughout the day, offering significantly more convenience.
❓ Does the Oppo K10x support VoLTE/VoWiFi on all carriers?
Carrier compatibility can vary. It's crucial to check with your specific carrier to confirm VoLTE and VoWiFi support for the Oppo K10x before purchasing, as compatibility isn't guaranteed across all networks.
