Xiaomi Redmi Note 11E Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A53 5G: A Detailed Comparison

The mid-range 5G smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11E Pro and Samsung Galaxy A53 5G represent compelling options, but cater to slightly different priorities. The 11E Pro focuses on rapid charging and a value-oriented chipset, while the A53 5G emphasizes display quality and Samsung’s established software ecosystem. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which device delivers the best experience.

Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing a vibrant display and brand recognition, the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is the better choice. However, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11E Pro offers significantly faster 67W charging and a competitive chipset at a potentially lower price, making it ideal for those who value speed and efficiency.

PHONES
Phone Names	Xiaomi Redmi Note 11E Pro	Samsung Galaxy A53 5G

Network
2G bands	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bands	HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100	HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands	1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66 - SM-A536U
5G bands	1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA	2, 5, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536U
Speed	HSPA, LTE, 5G	HSPA, LTE, 5G
Technology	GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G	GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
	CDMA2000 1x	2, 5, 48, 66, 77, 78, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536V

Launch
Announced	2022, March 02	2022, March 17
Status	Available. Released 2022, March 04	Available. Released 2022, March 24

Body
Build	Glass front, glass back	Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back
Dimensions	164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in)	159.6 x 74.8 x 8.1 mm (6.28 x 2.94 x 0.32 in)
SIM	Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM	· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight	202 g (7.13 oz)	189 g (6.67 oz)
	-	IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min)

Display
Protection	-	Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution	1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density)	1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density)
Size	6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio)	6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.4% screen-to-body ratio)
Type	Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak)	Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM)

Platform
CPU	Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)	Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
Chipset	Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm)	Exynos 1280 (5 nm)
GPU	Adreno 619	Mali-G68
OS	Android 11, MIUI 13	Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8

Memory
Card slot	microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)	microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal	128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM	128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM
	UFS 2.2	-

Main Camera
Features	LED flash, HDR, panorama	LED flash, panorama, HDR
Quad	-	64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7X", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens
Single	16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm	32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm
Triple	108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro)	-
Video	1080p@30fps	4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS

Selfie camera
Features	-	HDR
Single	16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm	32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm
Video	1080p@30fps	4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps

Sound
3.5mm jack	Yes	No
35mm jack	Yes	No
Loudspeaker	Yes, with stereo speakers	Yes, with stereo speakers

Comms
Bluetooth	5.1, A2DP, LE	5.1, A2DP, LE
Infrared port	Yes	-
NFC	Yes	Yes (market/region dependent)
Positioning	GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO	GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Radio	Unspecified	No
USB	USB Type-C 2.0, OTG	USB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLAN	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct

Features
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (market/region dependent)
	24-bit/192kHz audio	Virtual proximity sensing

Battery
Charging	67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min	25W wired
Type	Li-Po 5000 mAh	Li-Po 5000 mAh

Misc
Colors	Graphite Gray, Polar White, Atlantic Blue	Black, White, Blue, Peach
Models	2201116SC	SM-A536B, SM-A536B/DS, SM-A536U, SM-A536U1, SM-A5360, SM-A536E, SM-A536E/DS, SM-A536V, SM-A536W, SM-A536N, SM-S536DL
Price	About 240 EUR	$ 151.42 / £ 185.00 / € 169.14
SAR	-	0.75 W/kg (head) 1.58 W/kg (body)
SAR EU	-	0.89 W/kg (head) 1.60 W/kg (body)

Tests
Battery life	-	Endurance rating 113h
Camera	-	Photo / Video
Display	-	Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker	-	-26.5 LUFS (Good)
Performance	-	AnTuTu: 329802 (v8), 379313 (v9) GeekBench: 1891 (v5.1) GFXBench: 19fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11E Pro

Significantly faster 67W charging
Potentially lower price point
Efficient Snapdragon 695 5G chipset

Display likely less bright than A53
Software support may be shorter than Samsung

Samsung Galaxy A53 5G

Brighter and more vibrant display
Samsung’s polished software experience
Potentially longer software support

Slower 25W charging
Exynos 1280 may throttle under sustained load
Generally higher price

Display Comparison

The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G boasts a notably brighter display, reaching a measured 830 nits. This is a significant advantage in outdoor visibility compared to the Redmi Note 11E Pro (brightness data unavailable, but typically lower in this price bracket). While both likely utilize AMOLED panels for vibrant colors, the A53’s higher peak brightness and 'Infinite' contrast ratio suggest a superior viewing experience. The Redmi Note 11E Pro’s display specs are less detailed, suggesting a more standard AMOLED implementation. Bezels are likely comparable, but the A53’s overall display quality is a clear differentiator.

Camera Comparison

Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is limited. The A53 likely features a more refined image processing pipeline, leveraging Samsung’s expertise. While both may include multiple lenses, focusing on the main sensor is key. Without specific sensor size data, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. The Redmi Note 11E Pro’s camera system is likely geared towards providing good value, while the A53 aims for a more balanced and polished photographic experience. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing feature with limited practical utility.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G utilizes the Exynos 1280 (5nm), featuring a Cortex-A78 based CPU, while the Redmi Note 11E Pro employs the Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm). The Exynos 1280’s 5nm process generally translates to better power efficiency and potentially higher sustained performance. However, the Snapdragon 695 is no slouch, offering a solid experience for everyday tasks. The A53’s CPU architecture (Cortex-A78) provides a performance edge over the Kryo 660 Gold cores in the 11E Pro. RAM configurations are crucial, but assuming similar amounts, the A53 will likely handle demanding applications and multitasking more smoothly.

Battery Life

Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 113 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Redmi Note 11E Pro’s 67W wired charging is a game-changer, achieving 50% charge in just 15 minutes and a full charge in 42 minutes. The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G’s 25W charging is considerably slower. This means the 11E Pro can quickly recover from low battery situations, a significant convenience factor. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the 11E Pro effectively mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage.

Buying Guide

Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11E Pro if you need blazing-fast charging and prioritize getting the most performance for your money. It’s a strong contender for users who frequently top up their phones and don’t want to wait. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G if you prefer a brighter, more color-accurate display, a polished software experience, and the peace of mind that comes with Samsung’s brand reputation and longer software support.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Exynos 1280 in the Galaxy A53 5G tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?

The Exynos 1280 is known to exhibit some thermal throttling under sustained heavy load, such as extended gaming. While it won't shut down, you may experience a slight drop in frame rates after 30-45 minutes of intense gameplay. The Snapdragon 695 in the Redmi Note 11E Pro, with its 6nm process, generally runs cooler, potentially offering more consistent performance over longer periods.

❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on either phone actually useful for taking detailed close-up photos?

Generally, 2MP macro cameras on smartphones are more of a marketing feature than a genuinely useful tool. The low resolution results in images lacking detail and sharpness. While they can capture a very close-up perspective, the image quality is often subpar compared to using the main camera with digital zoom.

❓ Can the Redmi Note 11E Pro reliably maintain 60fps in demanding games like PUBG Mobile?

The Redmi Note 11E Pro can likely run PUBG Mobile at 60fps on medium settings. However, achieving consistently smooth performance at higher settings may be challenging due to the Snapdragon 695's limitations. Expect some frame drops during intense action sequences. The Exynos 1280 in the A53 will likely offer a more stable 60fps experience at higher settings.

❓ How does Samsung's software update policy compare to Xiaomi's for these devices?

Samsung generally provides longer software support for its A-series devices than Xiaomi does for its Redmi Note series. The Galaxy A53 5G is expected to receive at least three major Android updates and four years of security patches, while the Redmi Note 11E Pro will likely receive two major Android updates and three years of security patches. This means the A53 will remain current for a longer period.