The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11E Pro and Motorola Edge 30 Neo represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range 5G smartphone market. Both devices share the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G chipset, making a direct comparison of their other features crucial for discerning buyers. This analysis dives deep into display quality, charging speeds, and battery performance to reveal which phone offers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid charging and a potentially more streamlined software experience, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo edges out the Redmi Note 11E Pro. While both phones offer similar performance due to the shared Snapdragon 695, the Neo’s inclusion of 5W wireless charging and slightly brighter display provide a marginal advantage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 02 | 2022, September 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 04 | Available. Released 2022, October 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 152.9 x 71.2 x 7.8 mm (6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 202 g (7.13 oz) | 155 g (5.47 oz) |
| | - | Splash and dust resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~419 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.28 inches, 95.2 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 13 | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min | 68W wired
5W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4020 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Graphite Gray, Polar White, Atlantic Blue | Very Peri, Black Onyx, Ice Palace, Aqua Foam |
| Models | 2201116SC | XT2245-1 |
| Price | About 240 EUR | € 156.44 / $ 185.00 / £ 229.00 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 104h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.4 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 380818 (v9)
GeekBench: 1964 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11E Pro
- Very fast 67W wired charging
- Potentially lower price point (depending on region)
- MIUI offers extensive customization options
- MIUI can be bloated with pre-installed apps
- Missing display brightness data
- No wireless charging
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
- Brighter 1004 nit display
- Wireless charging support (5W)
- Cleaner Android software experience
- Wired charging is only marginally faster
- Camera specs are largely unknown
- May be slightly more expensive
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo boasts a measured peak brightness of 1004 nits, offering superior visibility in direct sunlight compared to the Redmi Note 11E Pro (brightness data unavailable). While both utilize OLED panels, the Neo’s higher brightness and infinite contrast ratio (nominal) contribute to a more vibrant and immersive viewing experience. The absence of refresh rate data for the Redmi Note 11E Pro suggests the Edge 30 Neo may offer a smoother experience if it supports a higher refresh rate, though this is unconfirmed. Bezels are likely comparable given the similar price points, but the Neo’s brighter panel is a clear advantage.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or optical image stabilization (OIS). Without this information, a meaningful comparison is impossible. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to significantly impact image quality, serving primarily as a marketing feature. Image processing styles will likely differ, with Xiaomi typically favoring more saturated colors and Motorola aiming for a more natural look. The absence of detailed camera specs makes it difficult to determine a clear winner.
Performance
Both the Redmi Note 11E Pro and Motorola Edge 30 Neo are powered by the Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU configuration with 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver cores. This means CPU performance will be virtually identical. The performance bottleneck will likely be RAM speed and storage type, data for which is missing. Thermal management will be similar, as the 6nm process node offers reasonable efficiency. Neither phone is designed for demanding gaming; they are suited for everyday tasks and moderate multitasking.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo has an endurance rating of 104 hours, suggesting solid battery life. While the Redmi Note 11E Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, the Edge 30 Neo’s 104-hour rating provides a benchmark. Crucially, the Edge 30 Neo supports both 68W wired charging *and* 5W wireless charging, offering greater flexibility. The Redmi Note 11E Pro offers 67W wired charging, reaching 50% in 15 minutes and 100% in 42 minutes. The Edge 30 Neo’s charging speed is comparable, but the addition of wireless charging is a significant advantage for users who prefer cable-free convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11E Pro if you need the fastest possible wired charging and are comfortable with Xiaomi’s MIUI software. It’s ideal for users who frequently top up their phones and prioritize minimizing downtime. Buy the Motorola Edge 30 Neo if you prefer a cleaner Android experience, value the convenience of wireless charging, and appreciate a slightly brighter display for outdoor visibility. It’s a better fit for users who want a more polished and less intrusive software experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in either phone struggle with graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Snapdragon 695 is a mid-range chipset and will struggle with demanding titles like Genshin Impact. Expect to play at low settings and potentially experience frame drops, even with reduced graphics. These phones are better suited for less demanding games and everyday tasks.
❓ Is the 5W wireless charging on the Motorola Edge 30 Neo significantly slower than the 68W wired charging?
Yes, 5W wireless charging is considerably slower than 68W wired charging. Expect a full charge via wireless to take several hours. However, it's a convenient option for overnight charging or topping up throughout the day without needing a cable.
❓ How does Xiaomi's MIUI software compare to Motorola's near-stock Android experience?
Xiaomi's MIUI is heavily customized and includes numerous features, but can also be perceived as bloated with pre-installed apps and aggressive battery management. Motorola's software is closer to stock Android, offering a cleaner, more streamlined experience with fewer customizations and faster updates.
