Xiaomi’s Redmi Note and Poco lines consistently deliver impressive value, but navigating their overlapping portfolios can be tricky. The Redmi Note 11 focuses on a balanced experience, while the Poco X4 Pro 5G prioritizes 5G connectivity and faster charging. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G is the better buy. Its Snapdragon 695 5G chipset offers a noticeable performance uplift, and the significantly faster 67W charging (full charge in 41 minutes) is a game-changer. While the Redmi Note 11 boasts slightly better endurance, the Poco’s advantages outweigh this difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 26 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, February 09 | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 73.9 x 8.1 mm (6.30 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | IP53, dust and splash resistant | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 700 nits, 1000 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, HyperOS | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version
64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | Virtual proximity sensing | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 60 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Graphite Gray, Twilight Blue, Star Blue | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | 2201117TG, 2201117TI, 2201117TY, 2201117TL | 2201116PG |
| Price | £ 95.00 / € 97.99 / ₹ 11,950 | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | 0.97 W/kg (head) 0.93 W/kg (body) | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 126h
|
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-25.8 LUFS (Very good)
|
-26.8 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 228044 (v8), 244526 (v9)
GeekBench: 1662 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 6.8fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9)
GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
- Slightly longer battery endurance (126h)
- Brighter display (736 nits)
- More affordable (likely, based on brand positioning)
- Slower Snapdragon 680 4G chipset
- Slower 33W charging (60 minutes to full)
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- Faster Snapdragon 695 5G chipset with 5G connectivity
- Significantly faster 67W charging (41 minutes to full)
- Potentially better sustained performance
- Slightly shorter battery endurance (119h)
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
Both the Redmi Note 11 and Poco X4 Pro 5G feature displays with an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting standard AMOLED panels. However, the Redmi Note 11 boasts a measured peak brightness of 736 nits, a crucial advantage for outdoor visibility. While both likely share similar resolutions and refresh rates (not specified in the data), the Redmi Note 11’s brighter display provides a superior viewing experience in direct sunlight. The lack of information on PWM dimming rates prevents a full assessment of eye strain potential.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, offering little differentiation. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a meaningful camera comparison is impossible. It’s reasonable to assume both employ similar multi-camera setups, potentially including a main sensor, ultrawide, and macro lens. However, the Poco X4 Pro 5G’s slightly higher processing power *could* translate to faster image processing and potentially better low-light performance, but this is speculative without further data.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X4 Pro 5G utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm), featuring a 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver configuration. This is a step up from the Redmi Note 11’s Snapdragon 680 4G (6nm) with its 4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold and 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver cores. The 695’s 5G modem is a clear advantage for future-proofing, and its architecture generally delivers better sustained performance under load. While both are 6nm chips, the 695’s newer architecture translates to a smoother experience with demanding apps and games.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 11 edges out the Poco X4 Pro 5G in endurance, achieving a 126-hour rating versus the Poco’s 119 hours. However, this difference is largely offset by the Poco’s dramatically faster 67W charging. The Redmi Note 11 takes 60 minutes for a full charge, while the Poco X4 Pro 5G reaches 70% in just 22 minutes and 100% in 41 minutes. This charging speed advantage is significant for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly. The slightly smaller battery capacity of the Poco is mitigated by its superior charging technology.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 if you prioritize maximizing battery life and don’t require 5G connectivity. It’s ideal for users who primarily browse, use social media, and make occasional calls. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you want a more future-proof device with 5G support, faster performance for gaming and multitasking, and significantly quicker charging speeds – making it perfect for power users and mobile gamers.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the Poco X4 Pro 5G handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Snapdragon 695 is a capable chipset for mid-range gaming. While it won't deliver flagship-level performance, it should handle PUBG Mobile at medium to high settings with stable frame rates. The 6nm process and improved architecture over the Snapdragon 680 contribute to better thermal management, reducing the likelihood of throttling during extended gaming sessions.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Poco X4 Pro 5G compared to the Redmi Note 11 in real-world use?
The difference is substantial. The Redmi Note 11 takes a full hour to charge, while the Poco X4 Pro 5G reaches 100% in just 41 minutes. This means you can add a significant amount of battery life in a very short time, making it ideal for users who are always on the go. A quick 20-minute charge on the Poco can provide hours of usage.
❓ Is the 5G connectivity on the Poco X4 Pro 5G worth the extra cost if I don't have 5G coverage in my area yet?
Even without immediate 5G access, the Poco X4 Pro 5G offers future-proofing. 5G networks are expanding rapidly, and the phone will be ready when coverage becomes available. Furthermore, the Snapdragon 695 generally offers improved 4G performance compared to the Snapdragon 680, even on existing networks.
