Xiaomi consistently delivers compelling value in the mid-range smartphone market. The Redmi Note 11 and Poco M4 Pro 5G represent two distinct approaches to achieving that value. The Note 11 prioritizes all-day battery life and a solid, reliable experience, while the M4 Pro 5G aims for a performance boost with 5G connectivity. This comparison dissects the key differences to help you choose the best fit for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G emerges as the stronger choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 810 chipset provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Redmi Note 11’s Snapdragon 680, and the inclusion of 5G future-proofs the device. While the Redmi Note 11 boasts slightly higher peak display brightness, the M4 Pro 5G’s overall package offers a more compelling experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 26 | 2021, November 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, February 09 | Available. Released 2021, November 11 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 73.9 x 8.1 mm (6.30 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) | 163.6 x 75.8 x 8.8 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| | IP53, dust and splash resistant | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 700 nits, 1000 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, HyperOS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | Virtual proximity sensing | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 60 min | 33W wired, 100% in 59 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Graphite Gray, Twilight Blue, Star Blue | Poco Yellow, Power Black, Cool Blue |
| Models | 2201117TG, 2201117TI, 2201117TY, 2201117TL | 21091116AG, MZB0BGVIN |
| Price | £ 95.00 / € 97.99 / ₹ 11,950 | About 150 EUR |
| SAR | 0.97 W/kg (head) 0.93 W/kg (body) | 1.07 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | 0.59 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 126h
|
Endurance rating 123h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: 1553:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-25.8 LUFS (Very good)
|
-24.9 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 228044 (v8), 244526 (v9)
GeekBench: 1662 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 6.8fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 296721 (v8), 353663 (v9)
GeekBench: 1797 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 13fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
- Slightly longer battery endurance rating.
- Higher peak display brightness for outdoor visibility.
- Reliable and efficient Snapdragon 680 chipset.
- Lacks 5G connectivity.
- Less powerful chipset compared to the M4 Pro 5G.
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
- Faster performance with the Dimensity 810 chipset.
- 5G connectivity for future-proofed data speeds.
- Higher display contrast ratio for a more vibrant image.
- Slightly lower battery endurance rating.
- Lower peak display brightness compared to the Note 11.
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 11’s display achieves a measured peak brightness of 736 nits, offering excellent visibility in bright sunlight. However, the Poco M4 Pro 5G’s display, while dimmer at 510 nits, boasts a significantly higher contrast ratio of 1553:1 compared to the Redmi Note 11’s infinite (nominal) ratio. This translates to deeper blacks and a more vibrant image, though the lower peak brightness may be noticeable outdoors. Both displays utilize LCD technology, and neither specification details refresh rate, suggesting a standard 60Hz panel on both.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature a 'Photo / Video' camera setup, but detailed sensor information is lacking. Without specifics on megapixel counts or sensor sizes, it’s difficult to draw definitive conclusions. However, given the Poco M4 Pro 5G’s positioning, it’s reasonable to expect a slightly more advanced camera system, potentially with larger sensors or improved image processing algorithms. The absence of details suggests both phones likely target similar image quality in everyday shooting scenarios, and the 2MP macro lenses common in this segment are unlikely to be a deciding factor.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco M4 Pro 5G is powered by the Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6nm), featuring a dual-core Cortex-A76 setup alongside six Cortex-A55 cores, clocked up to 2.4 GHz. This architecture is geared towards sustained performance. In contrast, the Redmi Note 11 utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (6nm) with a Kryo 265 Gold/Silver configuration, peaking at 2.4 GHz. While both are 6nm chips, the Dimensity 810’s core design provides a clear advantage in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming. The M4 Pro 5G also benefits from 5G connectivity, absent in the Redmi Note 11.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve similar endurance ratings – 126 hours for the Redmi Note 11 and 123 hours for the Poco M4 Pro 5G. The Redmi Note 11’s slightly higher rating likely stems from the less power-hungry Snapdragon 680 chipset. Both support 33W wired charging, achieving a full charge in approximately 60-59 minutes, with support for PD3.0 and QC3 standards. The marginal difference in endurance is unlikely to be noticeable in real-world usage, making charging speed a more significant factor.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 if you prioritize maximizing battery life and don't require 5G connectivity. It's ideal for users who primarily browse, use social media, and make calls. Buy the Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G if you want a faster, more responsive experience, especially if you plan to game or use demanding apps, and if 5G network access is important to you.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Mediatek Dimensity 810 in the Poco M4 Pro 5G get noticeably warmer during extended gaming sessions compared to the Snapdragon 680 in the Redmi Note 11?
While both chipsets are 6nm, the Dimensity 810's higher performance ceiling means it will generate more heat under sustained load. However, Xiaomi's thermal management solutions are generally effective, and the Poco M4 Pro 5G is unlikely to experience severe throttling. The Redmi Note 11 will remain cooler, but at the cost of performance.
❓ Is the 5G connectivity on the Poco M4 Pro 5G actually useful, or is it just a marketing feature?
The usefulness of 5G depends on your location and carrier. If you live in an area with 5G coverage and have a 5G data plan, you'll experience significantly faster download and upload speeds. Even if 5G isn't widely available now, the Poco M4 Pro 5G is future-proofed for when 5G networks become more prevalent.
❓ How does the contrast ratio difference (1553:1 on the Poco M4 Pro 5G vs. infinite on the Redmi Note 11) translate to real-world viewing?
The higher contrast ratio on the Poco M4 Pro 5G means deeper blacks and a more dynamic image. This is particularly noticeable when viewing content with dark scenes, such as movies or games. While the Redmi Note 11 has a brighter screen, the M4 Pro 5G's contrast will provide a more immersive viewing experience.
