Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 vs Samsung Galaxy A53 5G: Which Budget 5G Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing display quality and future-proofing with 5G, the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is the better choice. However, the Redmi Note 11 offers excellent battery endurance and faster charging at a potentially lower price point, making it ideal for those on a tighter budget.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 | Samsung Galaxy A53 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66 - SM-A536U |
| 5G bands | - | 2, 5, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536U |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 2, 5, 48, 66, 77, 78, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536V | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 26 | 2022, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, February 09 | Available. Released 2022, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 73.9 x 8.1 mm (6.30 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) | 159.6 x 74.8 x 8.1 mm (6.28 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| IP53, dust and splash resistant | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 700 nits, 1000 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G68 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, HyperOS | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7X", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (market/region dependent) |
| Virtual proximity sensing | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 60 min | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Graphite Gray, Twilight Blue, Star Blue | Black, White, Blue, Peach |
| Models | 2201117TG, 2201117TI, 2201117TY, 2201117TL | SM-A536B, SM-A536B/DS, SM-A536U, SM-A536U1, SM-A5360, SM-A536E, SM-A536E/DS, SM-A536V, SM-A536W, SM-A536N, SM-S536DL |
| Price | £ 95.00 / € 97.99 / ₹ 11,950 | $ 151.42 / £ 185.00 / € 169.14 |
| SAR | 0.97 W/kg (head) 0.93 W/kg (body) | 0.75 W/kg (head) 1.58 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | 0.89 W/kg (head) 1.60 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 126h | Endurance rating 113h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -25.8 LUFS (Very good) | -26.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 228044 (v8), 244526 (v9) GeekBench: 1662 (v5.1) GFXBench: 6.8fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 329802 (v8), 379313 (v9) GeekBench: 1891 (v5.1) GFXBench: 19fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
- Exceptional battery life (126h endurance)
- Faster 33W charging with PD3.0/QC3 support
- Potentially lower price point
- Limited to 4G connectivity
- Less powerful chipset compared to the Exynos 1280
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
- Brighter and more vibrant display (830 nits)
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- More powerful Exynos 1280 chipset
- Shorter battery life (113h endurance)
- Slower 25W charging
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching 830 nits compared to the Redmi Note 11’s 736 nits. This translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. Both displays share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting deep blacks, but the A53’s higher peak brightness provides a more dynamic and visually appealing experience. While neither specification details refresh rate, Samsung typically employs higher refresh rates in this segment, potentially offering smoother scrolling and animations. The A53’s panel is likely to be more color accurate, benefiting content creators and media consumers.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed with 'Photo / Video' capabilities, lacking specific details. However, given the market positioning, the Galaxy A53 5G likely features a more sophisticated camera system. Samsung typically prioritizes image processing and software features, potentially resulting in more pleasing photos in various conditions. While both likely include a standard wide and ultrawide lens, the A53 may offer features like optical image stabilization (OIS) which the Redmi Note 11 likely lacks. The absence of sensor size information makes a direct comparison difficult, but Samsung’s history suggests a larger sensor on the A53, improving low-light performance.
Performance
The chipset is where the two phones diverge significantly. The Galaxy A53 5G utilizes Samsung’s Exynos 1280 (5nm), while the Redmi Note 11 features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (6nm). The 5nm process node of the Exynos 1280 generally leads to better power efficiency and thermal performance compared to the 6nm Snapdragon 680. The Exynos 1280’s CPU configuration – 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – offers a more powerful core cluster for demanding tasks than the Redmi Note 11’s Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver). However, the Redmi Note 11’s 4G limitation is a significant drawback for users in areas with 5G coverage. The A53’s 5G capability provides a substantial advantage in network speed and responsiveness.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 11 edges out the Galaxy A53 5G in endurance, achieving a measured 126 hours versus 113 hours. This suggests the Snapdragon 680’s efficiency, combined with software optimization, allows for longer usage on a single charge. However, the A53’s 25W charging is slower than the Redmi Note 11’s 33W wired charging, which supports PD3.0 and QC3, promising a full charge in just 60 minutes. This faster charging speed mitigates some of the A53’s slightly lower endurance rating, offering quicker top-ups when needed.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 if you need exceptional battery life and fast 33W charging, and prioritize value over absolute performance. It’s perfect for users who primarily browse, use social media, and occasionally game. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G if you prefer a brighter, more vibrant display, 5G connectivity, and a more refined software experience, even if it means slightly shorter battery life and slower charging.