Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro vs Poco X4 Pro 5G: Which Xiaomi Mid-Ranger Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Poco X4 Pro 5G emerges as the better choice. Its Snapdragon 695, built on a more efficient 6nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage and better thermal management, coupled with a superior battery life of 119 hours compared to the Redmi Note 11 Pro’s 100 hours. While both offer 67W charging, the Poco X4 Pro’s faster full charge time seals the deal.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro | Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 - India | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 26 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, February 18 | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 202 g (7.13 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| IP53, dust and splash resistant | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 13 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 51% in 15 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Graphite Gray (Stealth Black), Polar White (Phantom White), Star Blue | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | 2201116TG, 2201116TI | 2201116PG |
| Price | € 121.46 / £ 169.57 | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | 1.08 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.58 W/kg (head) 0.86 W/kg (body) | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 100h | Endurance rating 119h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -24.4 LUFS (Very good) | -26.8 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 261309 (v8), 319093 (v9) GeekBench: 1729 (v5.1) GFXBench: 12fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9) GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro
- Slightly brighter display (746 nits)
- Potentially more refined camera software (Redmi line focus)
- Established Redmi brand reputation
- Less efficient MediaTek Helio G96 chipset
- Shorter battery life (100h endurance)
- Slower charging speed to full capacity
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- More efficient Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G chipset
- Longer battery life (119h endurance)
- Faster charging to 100% (41 minutes)
- Display brightness potentially lower than Redmi Note 11 Pro
- Poco brand sometimes associated with more aggressive software
- May lack some of the camera software refinements of the Redmi line
Display Comparison
Both the Redmi Note 11 Pro and Poco X4 Pro 5G feature displays with an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting deep blacks. However, the Redmi Note 11 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 746 nits, potentially offering better visibility in direct sunlight. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels (implied by the contrast ratio), the lack of refresh rate data prevents a full comparison of display smoothness. The absence of information regarding PWM dimming rates makes it difficult to assess which device is better suited for users sensitive to flicker.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, offering minimal insight. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a direct camera comparison is impossible. However, given Xiaomi’s tendency to prioritize camera specs in the Redmi line, it’s reasonable to assume the Redmi Note 11 Pro *might* have a slightly more advanced camera system, but this is speculative. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on both devices is largely inconsequential for serious photography.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) is architecturally superior to the Redmi Note 11 Pro’s MediaTek Helio G96 (12nm). The 6nm process node translates to improved power efficiency and reduced heat generation, crucial for sustained performance. The Snapdragon 695’s CPU, with 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold cores, also offers a clock speed advantage over the Redmi Note 11 Pro’s 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 cores. This means the Poco X4 Pro 5G will likely handle multitasking and graphically intensive games more smoothly.
Battery Life
The Poco X4 Pro 5G clearly wins in battery endurance, achieving a 119-hour rating compared to the Redmi Note 11 Pro’s 100 hours. This suggests more efficient power management thanks to the Snapdragon 695’s 6nm process. While both support 67W wired charging with PD3.0 and QC3, the Poco X4 Pro 5G is faster, reaching 70% charge in 22 minutes and 100% in 41 minutes, versus the Redmi Note 11 Pro’s 51% in 15 minutes. This faster charging speed is a significant convenience factor.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro if you prioritize a slightly brighter display (746 nits) and are comfortable with a chipset that, while capable, is less efficient than the Snapdragon 695. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you value longer battery life, smoother performance in demanding applications, and the benefits of 5G connectivity, all within a similar price bracket.