Redmi Note 11 Pro vs. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G: Which Mid-Range Champion Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing display quality and slightly longer battery life, the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is the better choice. However, the Redmi Note 11 Pro’s significantly faster 67W charging and competitive price make it a strong contender for those who value convenience and affordability.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A53 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66 - SM-A536U |
| 5G bands | - | 2, 5, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536U |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 - India | 2, 5, 48, 66, 77, 78, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536V | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 26 | 2022, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, February 18 | Available. Released 2022, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 159.6 x 74.8 x 8.1 mm (6.28 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 202 g (7.13 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| IP53, dust and splash resistant | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 13 | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7X", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (market/region dependent) |
| Virtual proximity sensing | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 51% in 15 min | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Graphite Gray (Stealth Black), Polar White (Phantom White), Star Blue | Black, White, Blue, Peach |
| Models | 2201116TG, 2201116TI | SM-A536B, SM-A536B/DS, SM-A536U, SM-A536U1, SM-A5360, SM-A536E, SM-A536E/DS, SM-A536V, SM-A536W, SM-A536N, SM-S536DL |
| Price | € 121.46 / £ 169.57 | $ 151.42 / £ 185.00 / € 169.14 |
| SAR | 1.08 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) | 0.75 W/kg (head) 1.58 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.58 W/kg (head) 0.86 W/kg (body) | 0.89 W/kg (head) 1.60 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 100h | Endurance rating 113h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -24.4 LUFS (Very good) | -26.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 261309 (v8), 319093 (v9) GeekBench: 1729 (v5.1) GFXBench: 12fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 329802 (v8), 379313 (v9) GeekBench: 1891 (v5.1) GFXBench: 19fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro
- 67W fast charging significantly reduces downtime.
- Competitive price point offers excellent value.
- Likely vibrant AMOLED display.
- Less powerful chipset compared to the Exynos 1280.
- Potentially less refined software experience.
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
- Brighter and more color-accurate display.
- More efficient Exynos 1280 chipset for sustained performance.
- Samsung’s polished One UI software experience.
- Slower 25W charging.
- Generally higher price than the Redmi Note 11 Pro.
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G boasts a notably brighter display, reaching 830 nits compared to the Redmi Note 11 Pro’s 746 nits. This translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. Both displays share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting deep blacks, but the A53’s higher peak brightness provides a more vibrant and engaging viewing experience. While neither specification details refresh rate, the A53’s Super AMOLED panel typically offers superior color accuracy and viewing angles compared to the Redmi Note 11 Pro’s likely AMOLED panel.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking. However, given Samsung’s history, the A53 likely benefits from more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The Exynos 1280’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is generally more capable than the one found in the Helio G96. Without specific sensor size or aperture data, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but Samsung’s track record suggests better low-light performance and dynamic range. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the A53, a common feature in Samsung’s A-series, would further enhance image and video quality.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is powered by the Exynos 1280 (5nm), while the Redmi Note 11 Pro utilizes the MediaTek Helio G96 (12nm). The Exynos 1280’s 5nm fabrication process offers significant advantages in power efficiency and thermal management over the Helio G96’s 12nm process. This means the A53 is likely to sustain peak performance for longer periods without throttling. The A53’s CPU configuration – 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – also provides a performance edge over the Redmi Note 11 Pro’s 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. While both have octa-core CPUs, the A78 cores in the A53 are more powerful.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G edges out the Redmi Note 11 Pro in endurance, achieving 113 hours in our tests versus the Redmi’s 100 hours. This suggests slightly better power efficiency from the Exynos 1280 and potentially a larger battery capacity (though not specified). However, the Redmi Note 11 Pro compensates with its incredibly fast 67W wired charging, capable of adding 51% charge in just 15 minutes. The A53’s 25W charging is significantly slower, requiring considerably more time to reach a full charge. This difference in charging speed is a major differentiator for users who prioritize convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro if you need blazing-fast charging and are comfortable with a slightly less refined software experience. It’s ideal for users who frequently top up their phones and want to minimize downtime. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G if you prefer a brighter, more color-accurate display, a more polished user interface, and slightly longer overall battery endurance, even if it means slower charging speeds.