Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro vs Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G: A Deep Dive Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and future-proofing, the Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G emerges as the stronger contender. Its Dimensity 1200 Max chipset offers a significant performance leap over the Redmi Note 11 Pro’s Helio G96, justifying the potential price difference. However, the Redmi Note 11 Pro’s exceptional battery endurance and 67W charging remain highly attractive.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro | Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 41, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 - India | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 26 | 2021, November 25 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, February 18 | Available. Released 2021, December 03 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Panda Glass) |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 158.2 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.23 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 202 g (7.13 oz) | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| IP53, dust and splash resistant | RGB notification lights around the camera island | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 920 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core 3.0 GHz |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | ARM G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 13 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, ColorOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 51% in 15 min | 65W wired, 100% in 31 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Graphite Gray (Stealth Black), Polar White (Phantom White), Star Blue | Starlight Black, Startrails Blue, Gold, League of Legends |
| Models | 2201116TG, 2201116TI | PFDM00, CPH2293 |
| Price | € 121.46 / £ 169.57 | About 400 EUR |
| SAR | 1.08 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.58 W/kg (head) 0.86 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 100h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -24.4 LUFS (Very good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 261309 (v8), 319093 (v9) GeekBench: 1729 (v5.1) GFXBench: 12fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro
- Exceptional 100-hour battery endurance
- Very fast 67W charging with multiple protocols
- Competitive price point
- Less powerful Helio G96 chipset
- Limited performance for demanding games
- Camera performance likely relies heavily on software
Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G
- Significantly more powerful Dimensity 1200 Max chipset
- Faster overall performance for gaming and multitasking
- Potential for superior camera image processing
- Slightly slower charging speed (31 minutes vs 15% charge)
- Potentially shorter battery life compared to Redmi Note 11 Pro
- Likely higher price
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 11 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 746 nits, a respectable figure for outdoor visibility. While the Reno7 Pro 5G’s display specifications aren’t provided, Oppo typically equips its ‘Pro’ models with high-quality AMOLED panels. The Redmi Note 11 Pro’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a standard AMOLED panel. The Reno7 Pro 5G, given its positioning, likely benefits from a higher refresh rate and potentially LTPO technology for improved efficiency, though this is speculative without specific data. The lack of detailed display specs for the Reno7 Pro makes a direct comparison challenging, but its brand reputation suggests a superior visual experience.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, lacking specific details. However, the Reno7 Pro 5G’s higher processing power suggests superior image processing capabilities, potentially leading to better dynamic range and noise reduction. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. The Redmi Note 11 Pro likely relies on software optimization to compensate for its less powerful chipset. The absence of details on both cameras makes a detailed comparison impossible, but the Reno7 Pro’s chipset advantage hints at better overall image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Redmi Note 11 Pro utilizes the Mediatek Helio G96 (12nm), featuring an octa-core configuration with 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This is a capable processor for everyday tasks, but it will show its limitations in graphically intensive games. Conversely, the Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G is powered by the Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max, an octa-core processor clocked at 3.0 GHz. The Dimensity 1200 Max, built on a more advanced process node (likely 6nm, though not specified), delivers significantly higher CPU and GPU performance. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more enjoyable gaming experience. The Reno7 Pro 5G is the clear winner for users who prioritize performance.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 11 Pro boasts an impressive endurance rating of 100 hours, indicating excellent battery life. Its 67W wired charging, supporting PD3.0 and QC3, can replenish 51% of the battery in just 15 minutes. The Reno7 Pro 5G offers 65W wired charging, achieving a full charge in 31 minutes, and also supports reverse wired charging. While the Reno7 Pro 5G’s charging speed is competitive, the Redmi Note 11 Pro’s combination of longer endurance and slightly faster initial charging provides a practical advantage for users who frequently find themselves away from a power outlet.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro if you need exceptional battery life and fast charging as your top priorities, and are comfortable with a more modest processor for everyday tasks. Buy the Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G if you prefer a smoother, more responsive experience for demanding applications like gaming and video editing, and value a more powerful chipset for long-term usability.