OnePlus Nord 2T vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro: Which Mid-Range Phone Reigns Supreme?

The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the OnePlus Nord 2T and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro represent compelling options. While both aim for a sweet spot of features and affordability, they take different approaches. The Nord 2T prioritizes processing power with its Dimensity 1300, while the Redmi Note 11 Pro focuses on rapid charging and a solid all-around experience. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which device delivers the best value.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the OnePlus Nord 2T emerges as the stronger contender. Its Dimensity 1300 chipset, built on a more efficient 6nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Redmi Note 11 Pro’s Helio G96, translating to smoother multitasking and gaming. While both offer comparable battery life and fast charging, the Nord 2T’s superior processing power makes it the better choice.

PHONES
Phone Names Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro OnePlus Nord 2T
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - InternationalHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66
5G bands-1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 78 SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 - India-
Launch
Announced2022, January 262022, May 19
StatusAvailable. Released 2022, February 18Available. Released 2022, May 21
Body
BuildGlass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frameGlass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame
Dimensions164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in)159.1 x 73.2 x 8.2 mm (6.26 x 2.88 x 0.32 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight202 g (7.13 oz)190 g (6.70 oz)
 IP53, dust and splash resistant-
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 5Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density)1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density)
Size6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio)6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeSuper AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak)AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetMediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm)
GPUMali-G57 MC2Mali-G77 MC9
OSAndroid 11, MIUI 13Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, OxygenOS 14
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)No
Internal64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM
 UFS 2.2UFS 3.1
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaDual-LED flash, HDR, panorama
Quad108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens-
Single16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm
Triple-50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens
Video1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
Features-Auto HDR
Single16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS
Sound
3.5mm jack YesNo
35mm jackYesNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
 24-bit/192kHz audio-
Comms
Bluetooth5.1, A2DP, LE5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD
Infrared portYes-
NFCYes (market/region dependent)Yes
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEOGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC
RadioUnspecifiedNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
 Virtual proximity sensing-
Battery
Charging67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 51% in 15 min80W wired, PD
TypeLi-Po 5000 mAhLi-Po 4500 mAh
Misc
ColorsGraphite Gray (Stealth Black), Polar White (Phantom White), Star BlueGray Shadow, Jade Fog
Models2201116TG, 2201116TICPH2399, CPH2401
Price€ 121.46 / £ 169.57€ 144.39 / $ 169.99 / ₹ 31,490
SAR1.08 W/kg (head)     1.08 W/kg (body)-
SAR EU0.58 W/kg (head)     0.86 W/kg (body)-
Tests
Battery life Endurance rating 100h Endurance rating 100h
Camera Photo / Video Photo / Video
Display Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker -24.4 LUFS (Very good) -25.6 LUFS (Very good)
Performance AnTuTu: 261309 (v8), 319093 (v9) GeekBench: 1729 (v5.1) GFXBench: 12fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) AnTuTu: 490545 (v8) | 604467 (v9) GeekBench: 2790 (v5.1) GFXBench: 40fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro

  • Faster charging speed (67W with multiple protocols)
  • Brighter display for outdoor visibility
  • Potentially lower price point

  • Less powerful chipset (Helio G96)
  • Less efficient CPU architecture
  • Potentially slower image processing

OnePlus Nord 2T

  • More powerful chipset (Dimensity 1300)
  • More efficient CPU architecture (6nm process)
  • Faster charging (80W with PD)

  • Dimmer display compared to Redmi Note 11 Pro
  • Potentially higher price point
  • May require a specific charger for optimal 80W speeds

Display Comparison

Both the Redmi Note 11 Pro and Nord 2T feature displays with an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting typical AMOLED characteristics. However, the Redmi Note 11 Pro boasts a significantly brighter panel at 746 nits measured, compared to the Nord 2T’s 636 nits. This translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both likely employ similar PWM dimming technologies, the Redmi Note 11 Pro’s higher peak brightness could be more beneficial for users who spend a lot of time outdoors or prefer a more vibrant display. The lack of high refresh rate information for both devices is a notable omission, but typical for this price bracket.

Camera Comparison

Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but specific details are lacking. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the chipset difference suggests the Nord 2T will have a more powerful image signal processor (ISP), enabling faster image processing and potentially better low-light performance. The Redmi Note 11 Pro may rely more heavily on software processing to compensate for a potentially less capable ISP. The absence of details regarding optical image stabilization (OIS) is a significant gap in the provided data; its presence would be a major advantage for video recording and low-light photography.

Performance

The core difference between these two phones lies in their chipsets. The OnePlus Nord 2T’s Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Redmi Note 11 Pro’s Mediatek Helio G96 (12nm). The 6nm process inherently offers better power efficiency, reducing heat and improving sustained performance. The CPU configuration further highlights this difference: the Nord 2T features a 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 core alongside 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, while the Redmi Note 11 Pro has 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This means the Nord 2T has faster, more efficient high-performance cores, resulting in quicker app loading times and smoother multitasking. The Nord 2T’s CPU architecture is demonstrably more capable for demanding tasks.

Battery Life

Interestingly, both the Redmi Note 11 Pro and OnePlus Nord 2T achieve an identical 100-hour endurance rating. This suggests that despite the more power-efficient chipset in the Nord 2T, battery life is comparable. However, the charging speeds differ significantly. The Redmi Note 11 Pro supports 67W wired charging, achieving 51% charge in 15 minutes, while the Nord 2T boasts 80W wired charging with PD support. This faster charging speed gives the Nord 2T a clear advantage for users who need to quickly replenish their battery. The inclusion of PD3.0 and QC3.0 support on the Redmi Note 11 Pro offers broader compatibility with chargers, but the Nord 2T’s raw charging speed is superior.

Buying Guide

Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro if you prioritize extremely fast charging and a consistently lower price point. Its 67W charging is excellent, and it’s a great option for users who frequently top up their battery throughout the day. Buy the OnePlus Nord 2T if you value performance and a more refined user experience. The Dimensity 1300 chipset delivers a smoother, more responsive experience, making it ideal for gamers and power users.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Mediatek Dimensity 1300 in the Nord 2T get noticeably warmer during extended gaming sessions compared to the Helio G96 in the Redmi Note 11 Pro?
The Dimensity 1300, built on a 6nm process, is inherently more thermally efficient than the Helio G96 (12nm). While both phones will experience some heat during prolonged gaming, the Nord 2T is likely to maintain higher sustained performance with less thermal throttling due to its superior efficiency. The larger process node of the Helio G96 means it generates more heat for the same level of performance.
❓ Given the similar battery endurance ratings, is the 80W charging on the Nord 2T truly a significant advantage over the Redmi Note 11 Pro's 67W charging?
Yes, despite the identical endurance ratings, the 80W charging on the Nord 2T is a substantial advantage for users who prioritize quick top-ups. While both phones will last a full day for typical usage, the Nord 2T can gain a significant amount of charge in a short period – potentially enough for several hours of use with just 15-20 minutes of charging. This is particularly useful for users with busy schedules.
❓ How does the CPU architecture of the Dimensity 1300 translate to real-world performance improvements over the Helio G96 in everyday tasks?
The Dimensity 1300’s CPU configuration, featuring faster and more efficient Cortex-A78 cores, results in snappier app launches, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user interface. The Helio G96, while capable, relies on older and less powerful Cortex-A76 cores. This difference is most noticeable when switching between apps, browsing the web, or running demanding applications.