Google Pixel 6a vs. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Google Pixel 6a emerges as the stronger choice. While the Redmi Note 11 Pro boasts faster charging and a slightly longer endurance rating, the Pixel 6a’s superior processor and image processing capabilities provide a smoother, more refined user experience and significantly better camera performance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro | Google Pixel 6a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 - GX7AS, GB62Z (USA/Canada) |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GX7AS (USA/Canada) |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 - India | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 40, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - G1AZG (International) | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 26 | 2022, May 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, February 18 | Available. Released 2022, July 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 152.2 x 71.8 x 8.9 mm (5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 202 g (7.13 oz) | 178 g (6.28 oz) |
| IP53, dust and splash resistant | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) | OLED, HDR |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 13 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 51% in 15 min | 18W wired, PD3.0 |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4410 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Graphite Gray (Stealth Black), Polar White (Phantom White), Star Blue | Chalk, Charcoal, Sage |
| Models | 2201116TG, 2201116TI | GX7AS, GB62Z, G1AZG, GB17L |
| Price | € 121.46 / £ 169.57 | $ 138.99 / C$ 228.74 / ₹ 23,999 |
| SAR | 1.08 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.58 W/kg (head) 0.86 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 100h | Endurance rating 94h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -24.4 LUFS (Very good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 261309 (v8), 319093 (v9) GeekBench: 1729 (v5.1) GFXBench: 12fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro
- Superior processor performance with Google Tensor
- Exceptional camera quality and image processing
- Clean and optimized software experience
- Slower charging speed (18W)
- Slightly lower battery endurance rating
Google Pixel 6a
- Rapid 67W wired charging
- Bright and vibrant display
- Longer battery endurance rating
- Less powerful processor
- Inferior camera performance compared to Pixel 6a
Display Comparison
The Pixel 6a’s display significantly outshines the Redmi Note 11 Pro in terms of brightness, reaching 876 nits compared to the Redmi’s 746 nits. This translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. Both displays share an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, but the Pixel 6a’s higher peak brightness provides a more dynamic and vibrant viewing experience. While both are likely OLED panels, the Pixel 6a benefits from Google’s color calibration expertise, likely resulting in more accurate colors. The Redmi Note 11 Pro’s larger size may appeal to some, but the Pixel 6a’s superior brightness and color accuracy give it the edge.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 6a’s camera system is a standout feature, leveraging Google’s renowned computational photography. While specific sensor details are missing for both, the Pixel 6a’s Tensor chip enables advanced image processing capabilities, including HDR+, Night Sight, and Magic Eraser. These features significantly enhance image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The Redmi Note 11 Pro’s camera is likely competent, but it lacks the software optimization and processing power of the Pixel 6a. The Pixel 6a’s image processing will likely result in more natural-looking photos with better dynamic range and detail. Ignoring the likely present 2MP macro sensors on both devices, the Pixel 6a’s overall camera experience is expected to be superior.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Google Pixel 6a’s Google Tensor chip, built on a 5nm process, is a clear upgrade over the Redmi Note 11 Pro’s MediaTek Helio G96 (12nm). The Tensor’s octa-core configuration, featuring Cortex-X1 cores clocked at 2.80 GHz, delivers significantly faster processing speeds than the Helio G96’s Cortex-A76 cores at 2.05 GHz. This difference is noticeable in demanding tasks like video editing, gaming, and app loading times. The Pixel 6a’s Tensor chip also includes dedicated machine learning cores, enhancing features like voice recognition and image processing. While the Redmi Note 11 Pro is capable for everyday tasks, the Pixel 6a offers a smoother and more responsive experience.
Battery Life
Both phones offer respectable battery life, with the Redmi Note 11 Pro achieving an endurance rating of 100 hours and the Pixel 6a at 94 hours. However, the charging speeds differ dramatically. The Redmi Note 11 Pro supports 67W wired charging, capable of reaching 51% charge in just 15 minutes, while the Pixel 6a is limited to 18W charging. This means the Redmi Note 11 Pro can be topped up much faster. Despite the slightly lower endurance rating, the Redmi Note 11 Pro’s significantly faster charging mitigates battery anxiety. However, the Pixel 6a’s more efficient Tensor chip may offset some of the battery capacity difference in real-world usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro if you prioritize rapid 67W charging and extended battery life, and frequently consume media where a bright display is crucial. You’ll also appreciate the lower price point. Buy the Google Pixel 6a if you value a clean software experience, exceptional camera quality powered by Google’s Tensor chip, and long-term software support, even if it means sacrificing charging speed.