The Xiaomi Redmi Note series consistently delivers impressive value, and the Note 11 Pro+ 5G and Note 11 Pro 5G are no exception. But with subtle differences, choosing between them can be tricky. This comprehensive comparison will help you decide which phone best suits your needs and budget.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G boasts significantly faster charging and potentially a slightly better camera, but the Pro 5G offers a more efficient chipset and a competitive battery life. Ultimately, the Pro+ 5G is for those prioritizing charging speed, while the Pro 5G is a solid all-rounder.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | - | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | - | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | - | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | - | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | - | 2022, January 26 |
| Status | - | Available. Released 2022, February 18 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | - | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | - | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | - | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | - | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | - | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | - | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | - | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | - | Adreno 619 |
| OS | - | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | - | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | - | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | - | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | - | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | - | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 15 min (advertised) | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Mysterious Black, Forest Green, Timeless Purple | Graphite Gray, Polar White, Atlantic Blue |
| Models | 21091116UG, 21091116UC | 21091116I, 2201116SG |
| Price | € 329.00 / $ 320.00 | € 120.33 / $ 230.00 / £ 319.00 |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) | 1.05 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 106h |
Endurance rating 115h
|
| Camera | Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.8 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | AnTuTu: 375528 (v8), 437872 (v9)
GeekBench: 2225 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 22fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 288914 (v8), 382902 (v9)
GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G
- Incredibly fast 120W charging
- Potentially better camera (based on general expectations)
- Smooth 120Hz AMOLED display
- Slightly shorter battery life
- Potentially less efficient chipset
- Higher price
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
- Excellent battery life (115h endurance rating)
- Efficient Snapdragon 695 5G chipset
- Competitive 67W charging
- Generally more affordable
- Slower charging compared to Pro+ 5G
- Potentially slightly inferior camera
Display Comparison
Both phones feature AMOLED displays with a 120Hz refresh rate, offering smooth visuals. The Pro+ 5G advertises an 'infinite' contrast ratio, typical of AMOLED, while the Pro 5G has a measured peak brightness of 746 nits, which is quite impressive. While both offer vibrant colors, the Pro+ 5G *might* have slightly better color accuracy, but this is difficult to confirm without detailed testing. The Pro 5G's measured brightness gives it a slight edge in outdoor visibility.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are advertised as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specs are missing. The Pro+ 5G is generally expected to have a higher resolution main sensor and potentially improved image processing, leading to slightly better photo and video quality, especially in low light. However, without specific sensor details, it's hard to definitively say.
Performance
The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G's Snapdragon 695 5G chipset (6nm) is more efficient than the Pro+ 5G's chipset (likely a Dimensity variant, though specifics are missing in the provided data). This translates to smoother multitasking and potentially better sustained performance, especially during demanding tasks. The Pro+ 5G might offer a slight edge in raw processing power, but the Pro 5G's efficiency is a key advantage.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G boasts an endurance rating of 115 hours, slightly exceeding the Pro+ 5G's 106 hours. While endurance ratings can vary, this suggests the Pro 5G's more efficient chipset contributes to better battery life. The Pro+ 5G's 120W charging is a game-changer, allowing for incredibly fast top-ups, but the Pro 5G's 67W charging is still quite respectable.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G is ideal for users who demand incredibly fast charging and are willing to pay a premium for it. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is a great choice for budget-conscious buyers who still want a capable 5G smartphone with good battery life and performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the 120W charging on the Pro+ 5G worth it?
If you frequently forget to charge your phone or need a quick top-up before heading out, the 120W charging is a huge convenience. However, if you charge overnight, the benefit is less significant.
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G's Snapdragon 695 5G chipset offers better sustained performance for gaming due to its efficiency, although the Pro+ 5G might have a slight edge in raw graphical power.
