Xiaomi continues to dominate the mid-range smartphone market, offering incredible value for money. Two contenders vying for your attention are the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G and the Poco F5. Both pack impressive features, but cater to slightly different needs. Let's dive into a head-to-head comparison to help you decide which one is right for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F5 emerges as the overall winner thanks to its significantly faster Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset, brighter display, and competitive pricing. While the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G boasts incredibly fast 120W charging, the Poco F5's performance and display make it a more compelling package.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | - | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | - | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | - | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | - | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | - | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | - | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | - | 161.1 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | - | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | - | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | - | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | - | AMOLED, 68B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | - | Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | - | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | - | Adreno 725 |
| OS | - | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | - | No |
| Internal | - | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | - | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | - | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | - | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | - | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | - | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 15 min (advertised) | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Mysterious Black, Forest Green, Timeless Purple | Black, Blue, White |
| Models | 21091116UG, 21091116UC | 23049PCD8G, 23049PCD8I |
| Price | € 329.00 / $ 320.00 | € 202.76 / $ 289.99 / ₹ 23,790 |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 106h |
Endurance rating 118h
|
| Camera | Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.3 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | AnTuTu: 375528 (v8), 437872 (v9)
GeekBench: 2225 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 22fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G
- Ultra-fast 120W charging
- Potentially better camera detail (depending on sensor)
- Good display quality
- Slower performance compared to Poco F5
- Lower peak brightness display
- Less competitive pricing
Xiaomi Poco F5
- Significantly faster performance (Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2)
- Brighter display
- Excellent battery life
- Competitive pricing
- Slower charging than Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G
- Camera performance may not be significantly better than Redmi
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 takes the display crown. While both phones advertise an 'infinite' contrast ratio (a marketing term), the Poco F5's measured 963 nits peak brightness is a significant advantage, especially for outdoor visibility. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G's display is still good, but lacks the same punch. Both likely use AMOLED panels with 120Hz refresh rates.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera comparisons are difficult without specific sensor and lens information. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G is often touted for its higher megapixel count main sensor, potentially offering more detail in ideal lighting conditions. However, the Poco F5's image processing and overall camera system are likely competitive, and the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2's ISP (Image Signal Processor) provides an advantage. Real-world testing would be needed to declare a clear winner.
Performance
Here, the Poco F5 absolutely dominates. The Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 is a substantial upgrade over the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G's chipset (likely a Dimensity 920 or similar). Expect noticeably faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and significantly better gaming performance on the Poco F5. The Poco F5's CPU configuration (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) is a powerhouse.
Battery Life
The Poco F5 demonstrates impressive battery life with an active use score of 11:52h and an endurance rating of 118h. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G claims an endurance rating of 106h. While the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G's 120W charging is a game-changer (15 minutes to 100%), the Poco F5's 67W charging still provides relatively fast charging times (around 46 minutes to 100%).
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G is ideal for users prioritizing ultra-fast charging and a potentially slightly better camera experience (though this is debatable). The Poco F5 is the better choice for gamers, power users, and those who value a smooth, responsive experience and a brighter, more vibrant display.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G's 120W charging worth it?
If you frequently forget to charge your phone and need a quick top-up, the 120W charging is a huge benefit. However, consider if the trade-off in performance is acceptable.
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Poco F5 is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset and optimized cooling system.
