Xiaomi offers a compelling range of mid-range and upper-mid-range smartphones, and the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G and Poco F4 represent two distinct approaches. The Note 11 Pro+ prioritizes blazing-fast charging and a high-resolution camera, while the Poco F4 focuses on delivering flagship-level performance with the Snapdragon 870. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing convenience and camera versatility, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G is the better choice. Its 120W charging dramatically reduces downtime, and while the Poco F4 boasts a more powerful chipset, the Note 11 Pro+'s overall package offers a more balanced experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | - | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | - | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | - | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | - | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | - | 2022, June 23 |
| Status | - | Available. Released 2022, June 27 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | - | 163.2 x 76 x 7.7 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | - | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | - | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | - | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | - | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 900 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | - | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | - | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | - | Adreno 650 |
| OS | - | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14.2 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | - | No |
| Internal | - | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | - | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide) 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | - | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | - | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | - | No |
| Loudspeaker | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | - | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 15 min (advertised) | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 38 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Mysterious Black, Forest Green, Timeless Purple | Moonlight Silver, Night Black, Nebula Green |
| Models | 21091116UG, 21091116UC | 22021211RG, 22021211RI |
| Price | € 329.00 / $ 320.00 | ₹ 16,999 |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 106h |
Endurance rating 101h
|
| Camera | Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | AnTuTu: 375528 (v8), 437872 (v9)
GeekBench: 2225 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 22fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 590961 (v8), 698586 (v9)
GeekBench: 3190 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G
- Incredibly fast 120W charging
- Potentially higher resolution camera for detailed photos
- Long battery endurance (106h)
- Likely less powerful chipset than the Poco F4
- Camera performance dependent on software processing
Xiaomi Poco F4
- Powerful Snapdragon 870 5G chipset for gaming
- High peak brightness display (1003 nits)
- Good thermal management for sustained performance
- Slower 67W charging
- Slightly lower battery endurance (101h)
Display Comparison
Both the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G and Poco F4 feature displays with an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting typical AMOLED characteristics. However, the Poco F4 distinguishes itself with a measured peak brightness of 1003 nits, offering superior visibility in direct sunlight. While the Note 11 Pro+ doesn't specify peak brightness, the F4’s figure indicates a more vibrant and readable outdoor experience. Both likely employ PWM dimming for low-brightness control, but specific frequencies aren't provided, making it difficult to assess potential flicker-related eye strain differences.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G is expected to feature a higher resolution main sensor (potentially 108MP or 200MP, based on the model line), offering greater detail and cropping flexibility. While the Poco F4’s sensor size and aperture aren’t specified, the Note 11 Pro+’s higher resolution suggests a potential advantage in well-lit conditions. Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) is a crucial feature for video recording and low-light photography, and its presence (or absence) on each device would significantly impact image quality. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit.
Performance
The Poco F4’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm) chipset is the clear performance leader. Its octa-core configuration – 1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585, 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585, and 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585 – delivers significantly more processing power than the unspecified chipset in the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and superior gaming performance. The Snapdragon 870’s 7nm process node also offers a good balance of performance and thermal efficiency, though sustained loads could still induce throttling. The Note 11 Pro+ likely utilizes a more power-efficient, mid-range chipset to prioritize battery life.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s 120W wired charging is its standout feature, achieving a full charge in a claimed 15 minutes. This is a massive advantage over the Poco F4’s 67W charging, which takes 38 minutes to reach 100%. While both phones have similar endurance ratings (106h for the Note 11 Pro+ and 101h for the Poco F4), the Note 11 Pro+’s faster charging mitigates any potential concerns about battery life, allowing for quick top-ups throughout the day. The Poco F4’s slightly lower endurance rating suggests it may require more frequent charging, despite its comparable battery capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G if you need incredibly fast charging, a versatile camera system, and long battery endurance for daily use. You'll benefit from minimal downtime and a consistently reliable experience. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F4 if you prioritize gaming performance and responsiveness, and are willing to trade some charging speed and camera features for a more powerful processor. This phone is ideal for demanding mobile gamers and power users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 870 in the Poco F4 exhibit significant thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 870 is known for its good thermal efficiency, but prolonged, demanding gaming will inevitably lead to some throttling. The Poco F4’s cooling system will mitigate this, but expect a gradual performance decrease after 30-60 minutes of intense gameplay. It's still a very capable gaming chip, but not immune to heat.
❓ How does the 120W charging of the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G affect long-term battery health?
While 120W charging is incredibly fast, Xiaomi incorporates technologies to minimize battery degradation. However, consistently using ultra-fast charging *can* contribute to slightly faster battery wear over several years compared to slower charging methods. The convenience often outweighs this concern for most users.
❓ Is the camera on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G significantly better than the Poco F4 in low-light conditions?
The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G's potentially larger sensor and software optimizations *could* result in better low-light performance, but this is heavily dependent on image processing. The Poco F4's image processing algorithms also play a crucial role. Without direct comparison samples, it's difficult to definitively say which phone excels in low light.
