The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G and the Honor X8c represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G aggressively targets power users with its headline 120W charging, while the Honor X8c prioritizes efficiency and affordability with the Snapdragon 685 chipset. This comparison dissects these core philosophies to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing minimal downtime and rapid recharging, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G is the clear winner. Its 120W charging is a game-changer. However, the Honor X8c offers a compelling value proposition for those seeking a reliable, efficient device for everyday tasks and moderate usage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | - | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | - | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | - | LTE |
| Speed | - | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | - | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | - | 2025, January 14 |
| Status | - | Available. Released 2025, January 20 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | - | 161.1 x 74.6 x 7.1 mm (6.34 x 2.94 x 0.28 in) |
| SIM | - | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 174 g (6.14 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | - | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | - | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | - | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1200 nits (HBM), 2800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | - | Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | - | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm) |
| GPU | - | Adreno 610 |
| OS | - | Android 15, MagicOS 9 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | - | No |
| Internal | - | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF, OIS
5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) |
| Features | - | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | - | 50 MP, f/2.1, (wide) |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | - | No |
| Loudspeaker | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0/5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | - | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (ultrasonic) |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 15 min (advertised) | 35W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Mysterious Black, Forest Green, Timeless Purple | Marrs Green, Midnight Black, Moonlight White, Cloud Purple |
| Models | 21091116UG, 21091116UC | ABR-LX1, ABR-LX2, ABR-LX3 |
| Price | € 329.00 / $ 320.00 | € 190.78 / $ 213.42 / £ 159.00 |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 106h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 375528 (v8), 437872 (v9)
GeekBench: 2225 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 22fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G
- Ultra-fast 120W charging
- Potentially superior display quality (based on contrast ratio)
- Long endurance rating (106h)
- Chipset details are missing, impacting performance assessment
- Potential for higher heat generation due to fast charging and unknown chipset
Honor X8c
- Efficient Snapdragon 685 chipset (6nm)
- Affordable price point (likely)
- Good thermal management (due to 6nm process)
- Slower 35W charging
- Missing display specifications suggest a standard LCD panel
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G boasts an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, a marketing term indicating a high-quality panel, but lacks specific details like peak brightness or panel technology (OLED vs. LCD). The Honor X8c’s display specifications are absent, suggesting a more standard LCD panel. Without further data, it’s reasonable to assume the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G offers a more visually vibrant experience, particularly in HDR content, assuming it supports HDR standards. The absence of refresh rate information for both devices is a notable omission, impacting smoothness during scrolling and gaming.
Camera Comparison
The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G advertises a photo/video camera system, but lacks specific sensor details. The Honor X8c’s camera specifications are also missing. Without knowing megapixel counts, sensor sizes, or aperture values, a direct comparison is impossible. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses in this segment suggests both phones likely include one, but their utility is limited due to the small sensor size and lack of optical image stabilization (OIS). Image processing algorithms will play a crucial role in determining image quality, but without sample images or detailed specifications, it’s difficult to assess.
Performance
The Honor X8c is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 (6nm), featuring an octa-core CPU split into 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 and 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This configuration prioritizes efficiency, making it suitable for everyday tasks and light multitasking. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s chipset is not specified, but its focus on fast charging suggests a more power-hungry processor. The 6nm process of the Snapdragon 685 in the X8c should translate to better thermal management and battery life compared to a potentially larger node process in the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G. Gamers will find the Snapdragon 685 adequate for less demanding titles, but the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s chipset performance remains unknown without further specification.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s 120W wired charging is its standout feature, promising a full charge in just 15 minutes. This is a significant advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery. The Honor X8c offers a more modest 35W wired charging. While slower, 35W is still respectable and should provide a reasonable charging speed for overnight charging or topping up during downtime. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G has an endurance rating of 106h, suggesting good battery optimization despite the power-hungry charging system. The Honor X8c’s battery capacity and endurance rating are unknown, but the Snapdragon 685’s efficiency should contribute to solid battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G if you need the fastest possible charging speeds, frequently use your phone throughout the day, and value a quick top-up over all else. Buy the Honor X8c if you prefer a balance of affordability, efficiency, and a dependable processor for everyday tasks, and aren't concerned with pushing the limits of mobile gaming or demanding applications.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ How long does it realistically take to fully charge the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G?
Xiaomi advertises a 100% charge in 15 minutes with the 120W charger. However, real-world charging times can vary based on battery temperature and usage during charging. Expect slightly longer times in less-than-ideal conditions, but it will still be significantly faster than the Honor X8c.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 685 in the Honor X8c powerful enough for playing games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 685 can handle PUBG Mobile, but you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to medium or low to maintain a stable frame rate. It's not a gaming powerhouse, but it's capable of providing a playable experience for casual gamers.
❓ Does the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G support wireless charging?
Based on available information, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G does *not* support wireless charging. Its focus is entirely on incredibly fast wired charging.
❓ What type of display does the Honor X8c use, and how does it compare to OLED?
The Honor X8c’s display type is not officially specified, but it is likely an LCD panel. LCDs generally offer lower contrast ratios and less vibrant colors compared to OLED displays, which are known for their perfect blacks and excellent color accuracy.
