Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G vs. Google Pixel 6a: A Deep Dive into Speed, AI, and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing speed and battery longevity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G is the clear winner. Its 120W charging dramatically reduces downtime, and its 106-hour endurance rating surpasses the Pixel 6a’s 94 hours. However, the Pixel 6a’s Tensor chip offers a more refined software experience and superior image processing.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G | Google Pixel 6a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | - | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | - | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 - GX7AS, GB62Z (USA/Canada) |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GX7AS (USA/Canada) |
| Speed | - | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | - | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 40, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - G1AZG (International) | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | - | 2022, May 11 |
| Status | - | Available. Released 2022, July 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | - | 152.2 x 71.8 x 8.9 mm (5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | - | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | - | 178 g (6.28 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | - | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | - | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | - | OLED, HDR |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | - | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | - | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | - | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | - | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | - | No |
| Internal | - | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Features | - | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | - | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | - | No |
| Loudspeaker | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | - | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 15 min (advertised) | 18W wired, PD3.0 |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4410 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Mysterious Black, Forest Green, Timeless Purple | Chalk, Charcoal, Sage |
| Models | 21091116UG, 21091116UC | GX7AS, GB62Z, G1AZG, GB17L |
| Price | € 329.00 / $ 320.00 | $ 138.99 / C$ 228.74 / ₹ 23,999 |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 106h | Endurance rating 94h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 375528 (v8), 437872 (v9) GeekBench: 2225 (v5.1) GFXBench: 22fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G
- Blazing-fast 120W charging
- Excellent 106-hour battery endurance
- Potentially lower price point
- Chipset performance likely lags behind Pixel 6a
- Camera details are limited, potentially lacking OIS
Google Pixel 6a
- Powerful Google Tensor chipset
- Exceptional camera software and image processing
- Clean Android experience with guaranteed updates
- Slow 18W charging
- Shorter 94-hour battery endurance
Display Comparison
Both the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G and Pixel 6a feature displays with an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting typical AMOLED characteristics. However, the Pixel 6a boasts a measured peak brightness of 876 nits, a significant advantage for outdoor visibility. While the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s brightness isn’t specified, the Pixel 6a’s higher figure translates to a more usable screen under direct sunlight. The lack of high refresh rate information for the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G is a notable omission, potentially impacting smoothness compared to other devices in its class.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 6a leverages Google’s renowned computational photography, powered by the Tensor chip. While sensor size isn’t specified, Google’s image processing algorithms excel at dynamic range and detail recovery. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s camera details are missing, but Xiaomi often emphasizes megapixel count. However, megapixel count alone doesn’t guarantee image quality; the Pixel 6a’s software optimization is a significant advantage. The absence of details regarding OIS on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G suggests it may lack this feature, potentially resulting in less stable videos and blurry low-light photos.
Performance
The Google Pixel 6a’s Google Tensor (5nm) chipset is the performance centerpiece. Its octa-core configuration, featuring Cortex-X1 prime cores, delivers a substantial performance uplift over typical mid-range silicon. The 5nm fabrication process also contributes to improved thermal efficiency. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s chipset is not specified, but given its price point, it likely utilizes a MediaTek Dimensity chip. While capable, it won’t match the Tensor’s raw processing power or AI capabilities. This difference is most noticeable in demanding tasks like video editing or complex gaming.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s 120W wired charging is its standout feature, promising a full charge in just 15 minutes. This is a game-changer for users who frequently need to top up their battery. The Pixel 6a’s 18W charging is comparatively slow. While the Pixel 6a has a 94-hour endurance rating, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s 106-hour rating, combined with the ultra-fast charging, provides a more flexible and convenient user experience. The difference in charging speed significantly impacts usability, especially for those with demanding lifestyles.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G if you need consistently fast charging, extended battery life, and aren’t heavily invested in the Google ecosystem. This phone is ideal for power users, travelers, or anyone who dislikes battery anxiety. Buy the Google Pixel 6a if you prioritize a clean Android experience, exceptional camera software, and the unique features powered by Google’s Tensor chip, even if it means sacrificing charging speed and some battery endurance.