The Xiaomi Redmi Note series consistently delivers impressive value, but choosing between the latest Pro+ 5G and the standard Pro can be tricky. Both offer compelling features, but cater to slightly different needs. This comprehensive comparison will break down the key differences to help you make the right decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G takes the lead with its faster Snapdragon 695 5G chipset, 5G connectivity, and significantly faster charging. However, the standard Pro boasts exceptional battery life and a vibrant display, making it a strong contender for those prioritizing longevity and screen quality over raw power.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 09 | 2022, January 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 15 | Available. Released 2022, February 18 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 202 g (7.13 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | IP53, dust and splash resistant | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 13 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | - | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min (advertised) | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 51% in 15 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Mirage Blue, Phantom White, Stealth Black | Graphite Gray (Stealth Black), Polar White (Phantom White), Star Blue |
| Models | 2201116SI | 2201116TG, 2201116TI |
| Price | About 250 EUR | € 121.46 / £ 169.57 |
| SAR | - | 1.08 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.58 W/kg (head) 0.86 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 100h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.4 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 261309 (v8), 319093 (v9)
GeekBench: 1729 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 12fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India)
- Faster Snapdragon 695 5G chipset
- 5G Connectivity
- 67W Fast Charging (faster than Pro)
- Potentially better camera processing
- Slightly less impressive battery life than Pro
- Potentially higher price
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro
- Exceptional Battery Life (100h endurance)
- Bright and vibrant AMOLED display (746 nits)
- Excellent value for money
- High contrast ratio display
- Slower Helio G96 chipset
- No 5G connectivity
- Slower charging compared to Pro+ 5G
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 11 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 746 nits, offering excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Pro+ 5G's display is also good, it doesn't quite reach the same level of brightness. The Pro's 'infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) suggests deep blacks and vibrant colors, further enhancing the viewing experience. Both phones feature AMOLED panels with a 120Hz refresh rate for smooth scrolling.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer versatile camera setups, but the Pro+ 5G likely has a slight edge due to potential software optimizations and the newer chipset's image processing capabilities. Both feature a main camera, ultrawide, and macro lens. Detailed camera comparisons would require extensive testing, but initial impressions suggest the Pro+ 5G captures slightly more detailed images in various lighting conditions.
Performance
Here's where the Pro+ 5G shines. The Snapdragon 695 5G chipset is noticeably faster and more efficient than the Helio G96 in the standard Pro. This translates to snappier app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance. The 6nm process also contributes to improved power efficiency. The Pro, while capable, will show its age more quickly with demanding tasks.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 11 Pro truly excels in battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 100 hours. This is a significant advantage for users who need a phone that can easily last through a full day or even two on a single charge. The Pro+ 5G, while still offering good battery life, doesn't quite match the Pro's longevity, although its 67W charging allows for incredibly fast top-ups.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) is ideal for users who want 5G connectivity, faster charging speeds, and a more modern chipset for smoother performance. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is a great choice for those prioritizing long battery life, a bright and contrast-rich display, and a slightly more affordable price point.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G worth the extra money?
If 5G connectivity and faster performance are important to you, then yes. The Snapdragon 695 5G offers a noticeable upgrade. However, if you prioritize battery life and a great display, the standard Pro is a compelling alternative.
❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G's Snapdragon 695 5G chipset provides significantly better gaming performance compared to the Helio G96 in the standard Pro. You'll experience smoother frame rates and less lag in demanding games.
