The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and two contenders vying for your attention are the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G and the vivo iQOO Neo 7. Both offer compelling features, but cater to slightly different needs. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide which one deserves your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The iQOO Neo 7 takes the crown thanks to its significantly faster charging, superior chipset, and generally smoother performance. While the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G offers a good value proposition, the Neo 7's raw power and charging speed make it the better overall choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - India |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 - India |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 09 | 2023, February 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 15 | Available. Released 2023, February 16 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 164.8 x 76.9 x 8.6 mm (6.49 x 3.03 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 202 g (7.13 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| | IP53, dust and splash resistant | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| | - | Always-on display |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 13 | Android 13, Funtouch 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | - | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min (advertised) | 120W wired, 50% in 10 min, 100% in 25 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Mirage Blue, Phantom White, Stealth Black | Interstellar Black, Frost Blue |
| Models | 2201116SI | I2214 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 440 EUR |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India)
- Good camera with 108MP sensor
- Reliable performance for everyday tasks
- Fast 67W charging
- Attractive design
- Less powerful chipset compared to competitors
- Slower charging than the iQOO Neo 7
- Software experience can be improved
vivo iQOO Neo 7
- Blazing-fast 120W charging
- Powerful Dimensity 8200 chipset
- Excellent gaming performance
- Smooth user experience
- Camera might not be as detailed as the Redmi in ideal lighting
- Design might not appeal to everyone
- Potentially less RAM/storage options at lower price points
Display Comparison
Both phones feature vibrant AMOLED displays, but the iQOO Neo 7 likely has a slightly higher refresh rate (typically 120Hz vs. 120Hz on the Redmi). Color accuracy and brightness are generally comparable, offering a pleasant viewing experience for both.
Camera Comparison
The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G boasts a 108MP main camera, potentially offering more detail in well-lit conditions. However, the iQOO Neo 7's image processing and overall camera software are likely to provide more consistent and pleasing results, especially in challenging lighting situations. Both offer decent ultrawide and macro lenses.
Performance
The iQOO Neo 7's Dimensity 8200 chipset is a clear winner here. It offers significantly better CPU and GPU performance compared to the Snapdragon 695 5G in the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a better gaming experience on the iQOO Neo 7.
Battery Life
The iQOO Neo 7's 120W charging is a game-changer. It can charge the phone from 0 to 50% in just 10 minutes and 100% in 25 minutes. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G's 67W charging is still fast, but significantly slower by comparison. Battery capacities are similar, around 5000mAh, so real-world battery life should be comparable, but the iQOO Neo 7's charging speed provides a huge advantage.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G is ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize a good camera and a reliable, albeit not blazing-fast, experience. The vivo iQOO Neo 7 is perfect for gamers, power users, and anyone who values rapid charging and top-tier performance in a mid-range package.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The vivo iQOO Neo 7 is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful Dimensity 8200 chipset and faster refresh rate.
❓ How long does it take to fully charge each phone?
The iQOO Neo 7 takes approximately 25 minutes to fully charge with its 120W charger, while the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G takes around 42 minutes with its 67W charger.
