Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G vs Poco X5: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G edges out the Poco X5 thanks to its significantly faster charging and slightly brighter display. While both share the same processor, the Redmi's superior charging speed and display brightness make it the more appealing option for most users, especially those prioritizing quick top-ups.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G | Xiaomi Poco X5 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 26 | 2023, February 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, February 18 | Available. Released 2023, February 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 165.9 x 76.2 x 8 mm (6.53 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 202 g (7.13 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| IP53, dust and splash resistant | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits (HBM), 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 13 | Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm | 13 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min | 33W wired, 100% in 60 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Graphite Gray, Polar White, Atlantic Blue | Jaguar Black, Wildcat Blue, Supernova Green |
| Models | 21091116I, 2201116SG | 22111317PG, 22111317PI |
| Price | € 120.33 / $ 230.00 / £ 319.00 | About 230 EUR |
| SAR | 1.05 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) | 0.84 W/kg (head) 0.68 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) | 0.52 W/kg (head) 0.77 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 115h | Endurance rating 106h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -25.8 LUFS (Very good) | -27.3 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 288914 (v8), 382902 (v9) GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 400895 (v9) GeekBench: 2088 (v5.1) |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
- Faster 67W Charging
- Slightly Brighter Display
- Potentially Better Camera Quality
- Slightly Longer Battery Endurance
- Potentially Higher Price
- Design might be less striking to some
Xiaomi Poco X5
- Sleek Design
- Competitive Price
- Good Performance for the Price
- Slower 33W Charging
- Slightly Dimmer Display
- Camera may not be as consistent
Display Comparison
Both phones feature vibrant displays, but the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G takes a slight lead with a measured peak brightness of 746 nits compared to the Poco X5's 728 nits. While both offer excellent contrast ratios (infinite nominal), the Redmi's extra brightness will be noticeable in direct sunlight. Both use AMOLED panels, offering rich colors and deep blacks.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is a complex area. While both phones are marketed as having capable cameras, detailed image quality comparisons reveal the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G often produces slightly more detailed and vibrant photos, particularly in well-lit conditions. Low-light performance is comparable. Video recording capabilities are similar on both devices.
Performance
Interestingly, both devices utilize the same Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G chipset and CPU configuration. This means you can expect similar performance in everyday tasks, gaming, and multitasking. Real-world performance differences will likely be minimal and depend more on software optimization.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G boasts a slightly higher endurance rating (115h) compared to the Poco X5 (106h), suggesting marginally better battery life. However, the biggest difference lies in charging speed. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G supports 67W wired charging, allowing it to charge from 0% to 50% in just 15 minutes and 100% in 42 minutes. The Poco X5, on the other hand, is limited to 33W charging, taking approximately 60 minutes to fully charge.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is ideal for users who value fast charging, a brighter display for outdoor visibility, and a slightly more premium feel. The Poco X5 is a great choice for budget-conscious buyers who prioritize a sleek design and don't mind slower charging speeds.