Xiaomi's Redmi Note 11 series presents a confusing landscape of regional variants. While both the Redmi Note 11 (China) and the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) aim for the mid-range market, they diverge significantly in core components, particularly the chipset and charging technology. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device delivers the best value and performance for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid charging and a slightly more modern chipset, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) is the better choice. Its 67W charging completes a full charge in just 42 minutes, a substantial improvement over the Note 11's 33W charging. However, the Note 11's Dimensity 810 still offers competitive performance and may appeal to those seeking a balance of power and cost.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 28 | 2022, March 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 01 | Available. Released 2022, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 75.8 x 8.8 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | IP53, dust and splash resistant | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, 119˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1) | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 100% in 62 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Mysterious Black, Milky Way Blue, Mint Green | Mirage Blue, Phantom White, Stealth Black |
| Models | 21091116AC | 2201116SI |
| Price | About 140 EUR | About 250 EUR |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (China)
- Potentially higher CPU performance for demanding tasks.
- More affordable price point (likely).
- Competent 5G connectivity.
- Significantly slower charging speed.
- Potentially less efficient 5G modem.
- May exhibit more thermal throttling under sustained load.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India)
- Ultra-fast 67W charging.
- More efficient 5G modem.
- Potentially better thermal management.
- Slightly lower CPU clock speeds.
- May be more expensive.
- Image processing may not be as refined as higher-end Snapdragon chips.
Display Comparison
While both devices likely feature similar LCD panels given their market positioning, the context data doesn't provide specifics. We can assume both target FHD+ resolution. The absence of information regarding refresh rates or PWM dimming makes a direct comparison impossible, but users sensitive to flicker should research independent reviews for these details. Bezels are likely comparable, typical of this price bracket.
Camera Comparison
Without camera sensor details, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G's positioning suggests a potentially more advanced camera system. The Snapdragon 695's ISP (Image Signal Processor) is generally considered more capable than the Dimensity 810's, potentially resulting in better image processing, especially in low-light conditions. The absence of information on OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is a key omission; its presence on either device would be a significant advantage.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Redmi Note 11 (China) utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6nm), featuring a dual-cluster CPU with 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) employs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm), with 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold cores and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver cores. While both are 6nm chips, the Dimensity 810 generally exhibits slightly higher CPU performance in benchmarks, but the Snapdragon 695 boasts a more efficient 5G modem and potentially better sustained performance due to Qualcomm's thermal management expertise. The Snapdragon 695's Kryo cores are designed for efficiency, potentially leading to longer battery life during moderate use.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 11 (China) supports 33W wired charging, taking 62 minutes for a full charge. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) significantly ups the ante with 67W wired charging, achieving 50% charge in 15 minutes and 100% in just 42 minutes. This is a substantial difference, catering to users who prioritize quick top-ups. While battery capacity isn't specified, the faster charging of the Pro+ model effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (China) if you prioritize a strong CPU for everyday tasks and light gaming, and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) if you frequently find yourself needing to top up your battery quickly, and want a chipset with slightly improved 5G modem capabilities, even if the CPU performance difference is marginal.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
Qualcomm's Snapdragon 695 is known for its relatively efficient thermal management. While it won't match the cooling performance of flagship chips, it's less prone to significant throttling compared to some other mid-range options. However, sustained gaming at maximum settings will still generate heat, and performance may decrease over time.
❓ Is the difference in CPU performance between the Dimensity 810 and Snapdragon 695 noticeable in everyday use?
For typical tasks like browsing, social media, and video streaming, the difference in CPU performance between these two chipsets will be minimal. Both are capable of handling these workloads smoothly. The difference becomes more apparent in demanding applications like video editing or graphically intensive games.
❓ Does the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G support Power Delivery (PD) charging with non-Xiaomi chargers?
Yes, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G supports Power Delivery (PD) 3.0 and Quick Charge (QC) 3.0, allowing compatibility with a wide range of chargers. This provides flexibility and convenience for users who prefer to use their own charging accessories.
❓ How does the 5G performance differ between the two devices?
The Snapdragon 695 generally has a more mature and efficient 5G modem compared to the Dimensity 810. This can translate to slightly better signal reception and potentially faster data speeds in areas with strong 5G coverage. However, real-world 5G performance is also heavily dependent on network conditions and carrier support.
